Mitchell Penelope, Pirkis Jane, Hall Jane, Haas Marion
Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics, Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Apr;14(2):104-11. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008091.
Within the health services research community there is a growing strength of feeling that ongoing partnerships between researchers and decision-makers are critically important to effective transfer and exchange of knowledge generated from health services research. A body of literature is emerging around this idea that favours a particular model of partnership based on decision-maker involvement in research. This model is also gaining favour among health research funding bodies internationally. We argue that it is premature for the health services community to privilege any particular model of partnership between researchers and decision-makers. Rather a diversity of models should be conceptualized, explored in theory and practice, and evaluated. We identify seven dimensions that could be used to describe and differentiate models of partnerships for knowledge exchange and illustrate how these dimensions could be applied to analysing partnerships, using three case studies from recent and ongoing health services research partnerships in Australia.
在卫生服务研究领域，越来越多的人强烈认为，研究人员与决策者之间持续的伙伴关系对于有效转移和交流卫生服务研究产生的知识至关重要。围绕这一观点，正在形成一批文献，这些文献支持基于决策者参与研究的特定伙伴关系模式。这种模式在国际卫生研究资助机构中也越来越受到青睐。我们认为，卫生服务领域优先考虑研究人员与决策者之间任何特定的伙伴关系模式还为时过早。相反，应该构想多种模式，在理论和实践中进行探索，并加以评估。我们确定了七个维度，可用于描述和区分知识交流伙伴关系模式，并通过澳大利亚近期和正在进行的卫生服务研究伙伴关系中的三个案例研究，说明这些维度如何应用于分析伙伴关系。
