Suppr超能文献

英国质量与结果框架中激励使用的抑郁症严重程度问卷的患者与医生观点:定性研究

Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study.

作者信息

Dowrick Christopher, Leydon Geraldine M, McBride Anita, Howe Amanda, Burgess Hana, Clarke Pamela, Maisey Sue, Kendrick Tony

机构信息

University of Liverpool School of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2009 Mar 19;338:b663. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b663.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To gain understanding of general practitioners' and patients' opinions of the routine introduction of standardised measures of severity of depression through the UK general practice quality and outcomes framework.

DESIGN

Semistructured qualitative interview study, with purposive sampling and constant comparative analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

34 general practitioners and 24 patients.

SETTING

38 general practices in three sites in England: Southampton, Liverpool, and Norfolk.

RESULTS

Patients generally favoured the measures of severity for depression, whereas general practitioners were generally cautious about the validity and utility of such measures and sceptical about the motives behind their introduction. Both general practitioners and patients considered that assessments of severity should be seen as one aspect of holistic care. General practitioners considered their practical wisdom and clinical judgment ("phronesis") to be more important than objective assessments and were concerned that the assessments reduced the human element of the consultation. Patients were more positive about the questionnaires, seeing them as an efficient and structured supplement to medical judgment and as evidence that general practitioners were taking their problems seriously through a full assessment. General practitioners and patients were aware of the potential for manipulation of indicators: for economic reasons for doctors and for patients to avoid stigma or achieve desired outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite general practitioners' caution about measures of severity for depression, these may benefit primary care consultations by increasing patients' confidence that general practitioners are correct in their diagnosis and are making systematic efforts to assess and manage their mental health problems. Further education of primary care staff may optimise the use and interpretation of depression questionnaires.

摘要

目的

通过英国全科医疗质量与结果框架,了解全科医生和患者对常规引入标准化抑郁严重程度测量方法的看法。

设计

半结构化定性访谈研究,采用目的抽样和持续比较分析。

参与者

34名全科医生和24名患者。

地点

英格兰三个地区(南安普顿、利物浦和诺福克)的38家全科诊所。

结果

患者普遍支持抑郁严重程度测量方法,而全科医生对这些方法的有效性和实用性普遍持谨慎态度,并对引入这些方法背后的动机表示怀疑。全科医生和患者都认为严重程度评估应被视为整体护理的一个方面。全科医生认为他们的实践智慧和临床判断(“实践智慧”)比客观评估更重要,并担心这些评估减少了咨询中的人文因素。患者对问卷更为积极,将其视为医学判断的有效且结构化的补充,以及全科医生通过全面评估认真对待他们问题的证据。全科医生和患者都意识到指标可能被操纵的情况:医生出于经济原因,患者则是为了避免污名或达到期望结果。

结论

尽管全科医生对抑郁严重程度测量方法持谨慎态度,但这些方法可能有助于初级保健咨询,因为它们能增强患者对全科医生诊断正确以及正在系统评估和管理其心理健康问题的信心。对初级保健人员的进一步教育可能会优化抑郁问卷的使用和解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验