Coleman T, Wilson A
Department of General Practice, University of Leicester.
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):87-91.
Anti-smoking advice from general practitioners has proven efficacy. However, general practitioners do not exploit a large proportion of opportunities to discuss smoking with patients.
A study aimed to explore general practitioners attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients and to assess how these influence the quantity of anti-smoking advice that general practitioners report giving during routine consultations. It also aimed to determine the extent to which general practitioners report using evidence-based interventions against smoking and to discover the problems they experience when discussing smoking with patients.
A postal survey of all 468 general practitioners on the Leicestershire Family Health Services Authority list was conducted. General practitioners' attitudes were assessed by scoring 13 attitude statements using a six-point Likert-type scale. They were also asked to rank (from a list of 12 items) the five approaches that they found most productive and (from a list of 11 items) the five problems that they most commonly encountered when giving anti-smoking advice to patients.
A total of 327 questionnaires (70%) were returned. Most respondents (97%) thought that their advice was more effective when linked to patients' presenting problems and 65% reported that linking their anti-smoking advice to patients' presenting complaints was one of their three most preferred approaches to discussing smoking. Advising all presenting smokers to quit was considered by 40% of respondents to be an appropriate use of time but 76% reported that patients' lack of motivation was one of the three most commonly encountered problems. An analysis of the ratings of the 13 statements suggested that general practitioners who reported the greatest smoking cessation activity during routine consultations held more positive attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients.
This study suggests that general practitioners believe that their anti-smoking advice is more effective when linked to patients' presenting complaints, and this belief appears to be reflected in the way in which general practitioners approach smoking cessation with patients. The findings may indicate that general practitioners are unlikely to accept a role in a population-based anti-smoking strategy which demands that they discuss smoking with all presenting smokers.
全科医生提供的戒烟建议已被证明具有疗效。然而,全科医生并未充分利用与患者讨论吸烟问题的大量机会。
一项研究旨在探讨全科医生对与患者讨论吸烟问题的态度,并评估这些态度如何影响全科医生在常规会诊中报告的戒烟建议数量。该研究还旨在确定全科医生报告使用循证戒烟干预措施的程度,并发现他们在与患者讨论吸烟问题时遇到的问题。
对莱斯特郡家庭健康服务管理局名单上的所有468名全科医生进行了邮寄调查。通过使用六点李克特量表对13条态度陈述进行评分来评估全科医生的态度。他们还被要求(从12项列表中)对他们认为最有效的五种方法进行排序,以及(从11项列表中)对他们在向患者提供戒烟建议时最常遇到的五个问题进行排序。
共收回327份问卷(70%)。大多数受访者(97%)认为,当将他们的建议与患者提出的问题联系起来时,建议会更有效,65%的受访者报告说,将他们的戒烟建议与患者提出的投诉联系起来是他们讨论吸烟问题的三种最受欢迎的方法之一。40%的受访者认为,建议所有前来就诊的吸烟者戒烟是对时间的合理利用,但76% 的受访者报告说,患者缺乏动力是三个最常遇到的问题之一。对13条陈述评分的分析表明,在常规会诊中报告最大戒烟活动量的全科医生对与患者讨论吸烟问题持更积极的态度。
本研究表明,全科医生认为,当将他们的戒烟建议与患者提出的投诉联系起来时,建议会更有效,这种信念似乎反映在全科医生与患者进行戒烟的方式上。研究结果可能表明,全科医生不太可能在基于人群的戒烟策略中承担要求他们与所有前来就诊的吸烟者讨论吸烟问题的角色。