Picard Hernàn J, Amado Isabelle, Bourdel Marie-Chantal, Landgraf Steffen, Olié Jean-Pierre, Krebs Marie-Odile
INSERM, Laboratoire de Physiopathologie des Maladies Psychiatriques, Centre Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, U894, Paris, France.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Jun 15;33(4):676-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
Neurological Soft Signs (NSS) and impairments in oculomotor saccadic paradigms are both frequent in patients with schizophrenia but their correlation has never been explored.
78 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia (including 43 non-treated) and 41 matched healthy controls were tested for NSS, and on three saccadic tasks: prosaccades, predictive saccades and memory-guided saccades) using infrared oculometry. We analyzed correlations between NSS scores and latencies in all three tasks, rate of errors in memory-guided saccades, and rate of anticipated predictive saccades.
No correlations were found in healthy controls. In the patient group, the NSS total and motor coordination scores were positively correlated with three saccadic variables: the latency of prosaccades (r=0.36, p<0.01 and r=0.36, p<0.01 respectively), of memory-guided saccades (r=0.35, p<0.01 and r=0.32, p<0.05 respectively) and, negative correlations were found, with the rate of anticipated predictive saccades (r=-0.33, p<0.01; r=-0.35, p<0.01 respectively). NSS total, motor coordination and sensory integration scores were correlated to the latency of non-anticipated predictive saccades (r=0.34, p<0.01; r=0.24, p<0.05 and r=0.40, p<0.001 respectively). The NSS total, motor integration and sensory integration scores were correlated with the rate of errors in memory-guided saccades (r=0.38, p<0.01; r=0.37, p<0.01 and r=0.34, p<0.01 respectively).
These results support a common pathological mechanism with partial overlapping neural substrates between NSS and saccades in schizophrenia.
神经软体征(NSS)和眼球运动扫视范式受损在精神分裂症患者中均很常见,但它们之间的相关性从未被探讨过。
对78例DSM-IV精神分裂症患者(包括43例未接受治疗者)和41名匹配的健康对照者进行NSS测试,并使用红外眼动测量法对其进行三项扫视任务测试:前向扫视、预测性扫视和记忆引导扫视。我们分析了NSS评分与所有三项任务中的潜伏期、记忆引导扫视中的错误率以及预期预测性扫视率之间的相关性。
在健康对照者中未发现相关性。在患者组中,NSS总分和运动协调评分与三个扫视变量呈正相关:前向扫视的潜伏期(分别为r = 0.36,p < 0.01和r = 0.36,p < 0.01)、记忆引导扫视的潜伏期(分别为r = 0.35,p < 0.01和r = 0.32,p < 0.05),并且发现与预期预测性扫视率呈负相关(分别为r = -0.33,p < 0.01;r = -0.35,p < 0.01)。NSS总分、运动协调和感觉整合评分与非预期预测性扫视的潜伏期相关(分别为r = 0.34,p < 0.01;r = 0.24,p < 0.05和r = 0.40,p < 0.001)。NSS总分、运动整合和感觉整合评分与记忆引导扫视中的错误率相关(分别为r = 0.38,p < 0.01;r = 0.37,p < 0.01和r = 0.34,p < 0.01)。
这些结果支持精神分裂症中NSS和扫视之间存在具有部分重叠神经基质的共同病理机制。