Micheyl Christophe, McDermott Josh H, Oxenham Andrew J
Auditory Perception and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0344, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jan;71(1):5-7. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.1.5.
Thresholds in various visual and auditory perception tasks have been found to improve markedly with practice at intermediate levels of task difficulty. Recently, however, there have been reports that training with identical stimuli, which, by definition, were impossible to discriminate correctly beyond chance, could induce as much discrimination learning as could training with different stimuli. These surprising findings have been interpreted as evidence that discrimination learning can occur in the absence of perceived differences between stimuli and need not involve the fine-tuning of a discrimination mechanism. Here, we show that these counterintuitive findings of discrimination learning without discrimination can be understood simply by considering the effect of internal noise on sensory representations. Because of such noise, physically identical stimuli are unlikely to be perceived as being strictly identical. We show that, given empirically derived levels of sensory noise, perceived differences evoked by identical stimuli are actually not much smaller than those induced by the physical differences typically used in discrimination-learning experiments. We suggest that findings of discrimination learning with identical stimuli can be explained without implicating any fundamentally new learning mechanism.
人们发现,在各种视觉和听觉感知任务中,当任务难度处于中等水平时,随着练习,阈值会显著提高。然而,最近有报告称,使用相同刺激进行训练,从定义上讲,这些刺激在随机水平之上是无法正确区分的,但却能产生与使用不同刺激进行训练一样多的辨别学习。这些惊人的发现被解释为证据,表明辨别学习可以在刺激之间没有可感知差异的情况下发生,并且不一定涉及辨别机制的微调。在这里,我们表明,这些关于无辨别情况下的辨别学习的违反直觉的发现,只需考虑内部噪声对感官表征的影响就能简单地理解。由于这种噪声,物理上相同的刺激不太可能被感知为完全相同。我们表明,根据经验得出的感官噪声水平,相同刺激引起的可感知差异实际上并不比辨别学习实验中通常使用的物理差异引起的差异小多少。我们认为,相同刺激下的辨别学习结果可以在不涉及任何根本上新的学习机制的情况下得到解释。