Drost Ulrich C, Rieger Martina, Brass Marcel, Gunter Thomas C, Prinz Wolfgang
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Psychology, Munich, Germany.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Nov;58(8):1376-89. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000610.
In this study, pianists were tested for learned associations between actions (movements on the piano) and their perceivable sensory effects (piano tones). Actions were examined that required the playing of two-tone sequences (intervals) in a four-choice paradigm. In Experiment 1, the intervals to be played were denoted by visual note stimuli. Concurrently with these imperative stimuli, task-irrelevant auditory distractor intervals were presented ("potential" action effects, congruent or incongruent). In Experiment 2, imperative stimuli were coloured squares, in order to exclude possible influences of spatial relationships of notes, responses, and auditory stimuli. In both experiments responses in the incongruent conditions were slower than those in the congruent conditions. Also, heard intervals actually "induced" false responses. The reaction time effects were more pronounced in Experiment 2. In nonmusicians (Experiment 3), no evidence for interference could be observed. Thus, our results show that in expert pianists potential action effects are able to induce corresponding actions, which demonstrates the existence of acquired action-effect associations in pianists.
在本研究中,对钢琴演奏者进行测试,以考察动作(在钢琴上的弹奏动作)与其可感知的感官效果(钢琴音调)之间的习得关联。所考察的动作要求在四选范式中弹奏双音序列(音程)。在实验1中,要弹奏的音程由视觉音符刺激表示。与这些指令性刺激同时呈现任务无关的听觉干扰音程(“潜在”动作效果,一致或不一致)。在实验2中,指令性刺激为彩色方块,以排除音符、反应和听觉刺激的空间关系可能产生的影响。在两个实验中,不一致条件下的反应均比一致条件下的反应慢。此外,听到的音程实际上“诱发”了错误反应。反应时间效应在实验2中更为明显。在非音乐家(实验3)中,未观察到干扰的证据。因此,我们的结果表明,在专业钢琴演奏者中,潜在的动作效果能够诱发相应的动作,这证明了钢琴演奏者中存在习得的动作-效果关联。