Knoblich Günther, Repp Bruno H
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Centre for Cognition (DCC), Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):248-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.007.
In three experiments we investigated how people determine whether or not they are in control of sounds they hear. The sounds were either triggered by participants' taps or controlled by a computer. The task was to distinguish between self-control and external control during active tapping, and during passive listening to a playback of the sounds recorded during the active condition. Experiment 1 required detection of a change in control mode within trials. Experiments 2 and 3 introduced a simple rhythm reproduction task that requires discrimination of control modes between trials. The results demonstrate that both sensorimotor cues and perceptual cues are used to infer agency. In addition, there may be further influences of cognitive expectation and/or multimodal integration. In accordance with hierarchical models of intention [e.g., Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107, 179-217] this suggests that the sense of agency is not situated on one specific level of action control but subject to multiple influences.
在三项实验中,我们研究了人们如何判断自己是否能够控制所听到的声音。这些声音要么由参与者的敲击触发,要么由计算机控制。任务是在主动敲击过程中以及被动聆听主动条件下录制的声音回放时,区分自我控制和外部控制。实验1要求在试验过程中检测控制模式的变化。实验2和3引入了一个简单的节奏再现任务,该任务需要区分不同试验之间的控制模式。结果表明,感觉运动线索和感知线索都被用于推断能动性。此外,认知期望和/或多模态整合可能会产生进一步的影响。根据意图的层次模型[例如,帕谢里,E.(2008年)。行动现象学:一个概念框架。《认知》,107,179 - 217],这表明能动性的感觉并非位于行动控制的一个特定层面,而是受到多种影响。