Simůnek Tomás, Stérba Martin, Popelová Olga, Adamcová Michaela, Hrdina Radomír, Gersl Vladimír
Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Pharmacol Rep. 2009 Jan-Feb;61(1):154-71. doi: 10.1016/s1734-1140(09)70018-0.
The risk of cardiotoxicity is the most serious drawback to the clinical usefulness of anthracycline antineoplastic antibiotics, which include doxorubicin (adriamycin), daunorubicin or epirubicin. Nevertheless, these compounds remain among the most widely used anticancer drugs. The molecular pathogenesis of anthracycline cardiotoxicity remains highly controversial, although the oxidative stress-based hypothesis involving intramyocardial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has gained the widest acceptance. Anthracyclines may promote the formation of ROS through redox cycling of their aglycones as well as their anthracycline-iron complexes. This proposed mechanism has become particularly popular in light of the high cardioprotective efficacy of dexrazoxane (ICRF-187). The mechanism of action of this drug has been attributed to its hydrolytic transformation into the iron-chelating metabolite ADR-925, which may act by displacing iron from anthracycline-iron complexes or by chelating free or loosely bound cellular iron, thus preventing site-specific iron-catalyzed ROS damage. However, during the last decade, calls for the critical reassessment of this "ROS and iron" hypothesis have emerged. Numerous antioxidants, although efficient in cellular or acute animal experiments, have failed to alleviate anthracycline cardiotoxicity in clinically relevant chronic animal models or clinical trials. In addition, studies with chelators that are stronger and more selective for iron than ADR-925 have also yielded negative or, at best, mixed outcomes. Hence, several lines of evidence suggest that mechanisms other than the traditionally emphasized "ROS and iron" hypothesis are involved in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and that these alternative mechanisms may be better bases for designing approaches to achieve efficient and safe cardioprotection.
心脏毒性风险是蒽环类抗肿瘤抗生素临床应用中最严重的缺陷,这类抗生素包括多柔比星(阿霉素)、柔红霉素或表柔比星。尽管如此,这些化合物仍是使用最广泛的抗癌药物之一。蒽环类药物心脏毒性的分子发病机制仍存在很大争议,尽管基于活性氧(ROS)心肌内产生的氧化应激假说得到了最广泛的认可。蒽环类药物可通过其糖苷配基以及蒽环 - 铁络合物的氧化还原循环促进ROS的形成。鉴于右丙亚胺(ICRF - 187)具有很高的心脏保护功效,这一提出的机制已变得特别流行。这种药物的作用机制被认为是其水解转化为铁螯合代谢产物ADR - 925,它可能通过从蒽环 - 铁络合物中置换铁或螯合游离的或松散结合的细胞内铁来发挥作用,从而防止位点特异性铁催化的ROS损伤。然而,在过去十年中,出现了对这一“ROS和铁”假说进行批判性重新评估的呼声。许多抗氧化剂虽然在细胞或急性动物实验中有效,但在临床相关的慢性动物模型或临床试验中未能减轻蒽环类药物的心脏毒性。此外,使用比ADR - 925对铁更强且更具选择性的螯合剂的研究也产生了阴性结果,或者充其量是混合结果。因此,有几条证据表明,除了传统上强调的“ROS和铁”假说之外,其他机制也参与了蒽环类药物诱导的心脏毒性,并且这些替代机制可能是设计有效和安全的心脏保护方法的更好基础。