Suppr超能文献

峰值压力和潮气量受新生儿自动充气式复苏气囊使用方式的影响。

Peak pressure and tidal volume are affected by how the neonatal self-inflating bag is handled.

作者信息

Bassani Mariana A, Mezzacappa Filho Francisco, Coppo Maria Regina C, Marba Sérgio T M

机构信息

Centro de Investigação em Pediatria, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2009 May-Jun;85(3):217-22. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1886. Epub 2009 Mar 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how different ways of handling the neonatal self-inflating bag influences peak pressure and tidal volume.

METHODS

This is an experimental study involving 141 different professionals (physicians, resident physicians, physiotherapists, nurses and nursing technicians), who ventilated an artificial lung, adjusted to simulate the lung of a term neonate, using a self-inflating bag. Each professional handled the ventilator in five different ways: a) using both hands (10 fingers); and, with only one hand, b) five fingers, c) four fingers, d) three fingers and e) two fingers. Peak pressure and tidal volume data were recorded by the artificial lung equipment.

RESULTS

Both variables showed high variability, from 2.5 to 106.3 cmH2O (mean = 39.73 cmH2O; 95%CI 37.32-42.13) for peak pressure, and from to 4 to 88 mL (mean = 39.56 mL; 95%CI 36.86-42.25) for tidal volume. There was no significant influence of the profession on any of the variables (p > 0.05). However, bag handling significantly influenced both peak pressure and tidal volume (p < 0.0001), which were higher when the operator used both hands.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that most professionals delivered excessively high peak pressures and tidal volumes, which could increase the risk of barotrauma and volutrauma, especially when both hands were used to ventilate. On the other hand, a small number of professionals delivered insufficient pressure and volume for adequate lung expansion and ventilation. The delivery of inadequate ventilation was not dependent on profession.

摘要

目的

评估处理新生儿自动充气式复苏气囊的不同方式如何影响峰值压力和潮气量。

方法

这是一项实验性研究,涉及141名不同专业人员(医生、住院医师、物理治疗师、护士和护理技术员),他们使用自动充气式复苏气囊对一个模拟足月儿肺部的人工肺进行通气。每位专业人员以五种不同方式操作通气设备:a)用双手(10根手指);只用一只手时,b)用5根手指,c)用4根手指,d)用3根手指,e)用2根手指。峰值压力和潮气量数据由人工肺设备记录。

结果

两个变量均显示出高度变异性,峰值压力为2.5至106.3 cmH₂O(均值 = 39.73 cmH₂O;95%CI 37.32 - 42.13),潮气量为4至88 mL(均值 = 39.56 mL;95%CI 36.86 - 42.25)。专业对任何变量均无显著影响(p > 0.05)。然而,气囊操作方式对峰值压力和潮气量均有显著影响(p < 0.0001),当操作者用双手操作时,这两个值更高。

结论

结果表明,大多数专业人员提供的峰值压力和潮气量过高,这可能增加气压伤和容积伤的风险,尤其是在双手进行通气操作时。另一方面,少数专业人员提供的压力和容积不足以实现充分的肺扩张和通气。通气不足的情况与专业无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验