Colon Hector M, Finlinson Henriette A, Negron Juan, Sosa Irmaly, Rios-Olivares Eddy, Robles Rafaela R
Center for Sociomedical Research and Evaluation, Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 35607, San Juan, PR.
AIDS Behav. 2009 Jun;13(3):523-31. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9540-3. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
Injection drug users (IDUs) contaminate preparation materials with blood-borne pathogens by using syringes as measuring and dispensing devices. In collaboration with IDUs, we developed a preventive intervention consisting of four new preparation practices aimed at avoiding the use of syringes in the preparation, and reducing the contamination of the materials. This report describes the results of a pilot trial introducing the new practices to ascertain their adoption potential and their potential efficacy in reducing contamination. Participants comprised 37 active IDUs among whom the new practices were promoted during 16 weeks. In addition to self-reported behaviors, the study collected cookers and plastic caps from shooting galleries and tested them for the presence of blood residues. Adoption rates were: (1) cleaning of skin area with hand sanitizer--65.6%; (2) directly pouring water with a dropper into the cooker--56.3%; (3) drawing drug solution with a preparation syringe and syringe filter--34.4%; and, (4) backload rinsing syringes--53.1%. Rates of blood residues detected in cookers and plastic caps were 41.7% prior to the trial, 28.6% at week 8, 24.6% at week 14, and 12.0% at week 18. We believe the results of the pilot trial are compelling and suggest that this intervention merits further formal testing.
注射吸毒者(IDUs)将注射器用作测量和配药工具,从而使制备材料被血源性病原体污染。我们与注射吸毒者合作,开发了一种预防性干预措施,包括四种新的制备方法,旨在避免在制备过程中使用注射器,并减少材料的污染。本报告描述了一项试点试验的结果,该试验引入了这些新方法,以确定它们的采用潜力及其在减少污染方面的潜在效果。参与者包括37名活跃的注射吸毒者,在16周内对他们推广了新方法。除了自我报告的行为外,该研究还从射击场收集了炊具和塑料帽,并检测了它们是否存在血液残留。采用率分别为:(1)用洗手液清洁皮肤区域——65.6%;(2)用滴管直接将水倒入炊具——56.3%;(3)用制备注射器和注射器过滤器抽取药液——34.4%;以及(4)回注冲洗注射器——53.1%。试验前炊具和塑料帽中检测到血液残留的比例为41.7%,第8周为28.6%,第14周为24.6%,第18周为12.0%。我们认为试点试验的结果很有说服力,并表明这种干预措施值得进一步进行正式测试。