• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌的人群筛查:目标与方法

Population screening for colorectal cancer, the goals and means.

作者信息

Kronborg O

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Ann Med. 1991 Oct;23(4):373-9. doi: 10.3109/07853899109148076.

DOI:10.3109/07853899109148076
PMID:1930930
Abstract

The causes of colorectal cancer are complex and in most cases obscure, making primary prevention impossible at present. Secondary prevention by finding and treating early asymptomatic cancers may possibly reduce mortality from this very common cancer. Results from conventional treatment have changed little during recent decades and are unsatisfactory, with more than half of the patients dying from the disease. The incidence has increased during recent years in many countries, making it vital to evaluate possible benefits from screening. This review considers different methods of screening for colorectal cancer and includes an overview of continuing European controlled randomised trials with the faecal occult blood test, Haemoccult-II. No final evaluation is possible, but advantages and drawbacks of different strategies are discussed. Assuming that the goal of reducing mortality is achieved, several other problems remain unsolved: the organisation of screening, the training of doctors in endoscopy, cost benefit and cost effectiveness all of which will have to be solved before a population screening can be recommended. Present screening tools are not ideal and we have to continue the search for better markers of early colorectal cancers and even possible precursors like adenomas.

摘要

结直肠癌的病因复杂,在大多数情况下不明,这使得目前无法进行一级预防。通过发现和治疗早期无症状癌症进行二级预防可能会降低这种常见癌症的死亡率。近几十年来,传统治疗的结果变化不大且不尽人意,超过半数的患者死于该病。近年来,许多国家的发病率有所上升,因此评估筛查可能带来的益处至关重要。本综述探讨了结直肠癌的不同筛查方法,并概述了欧洲正在进行的使用隐血试验(Haemoccult-II)的对照随机试验。目前无法进行最终评估,但讨论了不同策略的优缺点。假设降低死亡率的目标得以实现,仍有其他几个问题有待解决:筛查的组织、内镜检查医生的培训、成本效益,在推荐进行人群筛查之前,所有这些问题都必须得到解决。目前的筛查工具并不理想,我们必须继续寻找更好的早期结直肠癌标志物,甚至可能包括腺瘤等癌前病变的标志物。

相似文献

1
Population screening for colorectal cancer, the goals and means.结直肠癌的人群筛查:目标与方法
Ann Med. 1991 Oct;23(4):373-9. doi: 10.3109/07853899109148076.
2
Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查在结直肠癌筛查中的成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):573-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00007.
3
Review article: balancing the ideal versus the practical-considerations of colorectal cancer prevention and screening.综述文章:权衡结直肠癌预防与筛查的理想与现实考量
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Feb;19 Suppl 1:71-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-0673.2004.01842.x.
4
Colonoscopy or barium enema for population colorectal cancer screening?结肠镜检查还是钡灌肠用于人群结直肠癌筛查?
Dig Liver Dis. 2003 Apr;35(4):207-11. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00054-9.
5
Screening for colorectal cancer: the cost to find an advanced adenoma.结直肠癌筛查:发现晚期腺瘤的成本。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Nov;97(11):2902-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07059.x.
6
Screening for colorectal cancer.
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Sep 1;113(5):373-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-5-373.
7
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult.使用粪便潜血试验(Hemoccult)筛查结直肠癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.
8
Planning for a possible national colorectal cancer screening programme.规划一项可能的全国性结直肠癌筛查计划。
J Med Screen. 1998;5(4):187-94. doi: 10.1136/jms.5.4.187.
9
The risks of screening: data from the Nottingham randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.筛查的风险:来自诺丁汉结直肠癌粪便潜血筛查随机对照试验的数据。
Gut. 1999 Oct;45(4):588-92. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.4.588.
10
Colorectal cancer. Which test is best?结直肠癌。哪种检测方法最佳?
Adv Nurse Pract. 2005 Jan;13(1):71-4.