Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2 Newark Street, London, UK.
Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):198-204. doi: 10.1177/0269216308102042.
This study estimates the frequency of different medical end-of-life decisions (ELDs) made in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2007-2008, comparing these with 2004. Postal survey was carried out with 8857 medical practitioners, of whom 3733 (42%) practitioners replied, with 2869 having attended a person who died in the previous year. The proportion of UK deaths involving (1) voluntary euthanasia (0.21%; CI: 0-0.52), (2) physician-assisted suicide (0.00%) and (3) ending of life without an explicit request from the patient (0.30%; CI: 0-0.60) is low. Better questions about ELDs showed both non-treatment decisions (21.8%; CI: 19.0-24.5) and double effect measures (17.1%; CI: 14.6-19.6) to be much less common than suggested in earlier estimates, rarely involving intent to end life or being judged to have shortened life by more than a day. Continuous deep sedation (16.5%; CI: 14.3-18.7) is relatively common in UK medical practice, particularly in hospitals, home care settings and with younger patients. Further findings about the distribution of ELDs across subgroups are also reported. Survey research in this area requires careful control over question wording if valid estimates and comparisons of the prevalence of ELDs are to be made. The high rate of sedation compared with other countries may be a cause for concern.
本研究旨在评估 2007-2008 年英国(UK)不同医疗末期决策(ELDs)的发生频率,并与 2004 年进行比较。采用邮寄问卷调查方式对 8857 名医疗从业者进行调查,其中 3733 名(42%)从业者做出了回应,其中 2869 名从业者曾参与过前一年死亡的患者。涉及(1)自愿安乐死(0.21%;置信区间:0-0.52%)、(2)医师协助自杀(0.00%)和(3)未经患者明确要求结束生命(0.30%;置信区间:0-0.60%)的 UK 死亡比例较低。更好的 ELDs 问题表明,非治疗决策(21.8%;置信区间:19.0-24.5%)和双重效应措施(17.1%;置信区间:14.6-19.6%)比早期估计更为少见,很少涉及结束生命的意图或被判断为缩短生命超过一天。持续深度镇静(16.5%;置信区间:14.3-18.7%)在英国医疗实践中相对常见,特别是在医院、家庭护理环境中和年轻患者中。还报告了关于 ELDs 在亚组之间分布的进一步发现。如果要对 ELDs 的流行率进行有效估计和比较,那么该领域的调查研究需要对问题措辞进行仔细控制。与其他国家相比,镇静的高比率可能令人担忧。