Chauhan Ashvini, Fortenberry Gamola Z, Lewis Dawn E, Williams Henry N
Environmental Sciences Institute, Florida A&M University, 1515, S. MLK Blvd., Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA.
Curr Microbiol. 2009 Jul;59(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9385-z. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
Predation by Bdellovibrio-like organisms (BLOs) results in bacterial community succession in aquatic ecosystems. The effects of nutrient loading on the distribution and phylogeny of BLOs remain largely unknown. To this end, we present our findings on BLO diversity from four north-Indian lakes that are variable in their trophic status; Nainital is eutrophic, both, Bhimtal and Naukuchiatal are mesotrophic and Sattal remains oligotrophic, respectively. Initially, total heterotrophic bacteria and BLOs were quantified by most probable number (MPN) analyses using Pseudomonas putida and Escherichia coli as prey bacteria. Total bacterial numbers were at least two-logs higher in the eutrophic lake samples compared with oligotrophic lake. Similarly, BLO numbers were approximately 39-fold higher using Pseudomonas sp., which is likely the preferred prey within these lakes. Conversely, significant differences were not observed between mesotrophic and oligotrophic BLO numbers when E. coli was used as the prey. PCR-RFLP of small subunit rDNA (SSU rDNA) of BLOs, followed by cloning, sequencing, and taxonomic categorization revealed distinct differences such that, eutrophic lake consisted of higher BLO diversity compared with mesotrophic and oligotrophic lake, most likely due to both, higher numbers and availability of a diverse population of prey bacteria resulting from nutrient loading in this ecosystem.
类蛭弧菌生物体(BLOs)的捕食作用导致了水生生态系统中细菌群落的演替。养分负荷对BLOs分布和系统发育的影响在很大程度上仍不清楚。为此,我们展示了对印度北部四个营养状态不同的湖泊中BLOs多样性的研究结果;奈尼塔尔湖是富营养湖,比姆塔尔湖和瑙库恰塔尔湖是中营养湖,萨特塔尔湖仍然是贫营养湖。最初,使用恶臭假单胞菌和大肠杆菌作为猎物细菌,通过最大可能数(MPN)分析对总异养细菌和BLOs进行了定量。与贫营养湖相比,富营养湖样本中的总细菌数量至少高出两个对数级。同样,以假单胞菌属作为猎物时,BLOs数量高出约39倍,假单胞菌属可能是这些湖泊中首选的猎物。相反,当使用大肠杆菌作为猎物时,中营养湖和贫营养湖的BLOs数量之间未观察到显著差异。对BLOs的小亚基rDNA(SSU rDNA)进行PCR-RFLP分析,随后进行克隆、测序和分类学归类,结果显示出明显差异,即富营养湖中的BLOs多样性高于中营养湖和贫营养湖,这很可能是由于该生态系统中养分负荷导致猎物细菌数量增加且种类多样。