Voracek Martin, Haubner Tanja, Fisher Maryanne L
Department of Basic Psychological Research, School of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, Room 03-46, A-1010 Vienna, Austria.
Psychol Rep. 2008 Dec;103(3):799-811. doi: 10.2466/pr0.103.3.799-811.
Nonpaternity (i.e., discrepant biological versus social fatherhood) affects many issues of interests to psychologists, including familial dynamics, interpersonal relationships, sexuality, and fertility, and therefore represents an important topic for psychological research. The advent of modern contraceptive methods, particularly the market launch of the birth-control pill in the early 1960s and its increased use ever since, should have affected rates of nonpaternity (i.e., discrepant genetic and social fatherhood). This cross-temporal meta-analysis investigated whether there has been a recent decline in nonpaternity rates in the western industrialized nations. The eligible database comprised 32 published samples unbiased towards nonpaternity for which nonoverlapping data from more than 24,000 subjects from nine (mostly Anglo-Saxon heritage) countries with primarily Caucasian populations are reported. Publication years ranged from 1932 to 1999, and estimated years of the reported nonpaternity events (i.e., the temporal occurrence of nonpaternity) ranged from 1895 to 1993. In support of the hypothesis, weighted meta-regression models showed a significant decrease (r = -.41) of log-transformed nonpaternity rates with publication years and also a decrease, albeit not significant (r = -.17), with estimated years of nonpaternity events. These results transform into an estimated absolute decline in untransformed nonpaternity rates of 0.83% and 0.91% per decade, respectively. Across studies, the mean (and median) nonpaternity rate was 3.1% (2.1%). This estimate is consistent with estimates of 2 to 3% from recent reviews on the topic that were based on fewer primary studies. This estimate also rebuts the beliefs and hearsay data widespread among both the public and researchers which contend nonpaternity rates in modern populations might be as high as about 10%.
非父认定(即生物学父亲与社会认知父亲不一致)影响着许多心理学家感兴趣的问题,包括家庭动态、人际关系、性行为和生育能力,因此是心理学研究的一个重要课题。现代避孕方法的出现,尤其是20世纪60年代初避孕药投放市场及其此后使用的增加,本应影响非父认定率(即基因和社会认知父亲不一致的情况)。这项跨时间元分析调查了西方工业化国家非父认定率近期是否有所下降。符合条件的数据库包含32个已发表的样本,这些样本对非父认定无偏差,报告了来自九个(主要是盎格鲁-撒克逊血统)以白种人为主的国家的24000多名受试者的非重叠数据。发表年份从1932年到1999年,报告的非父认定事件的估计年份(即非父认定的时间发生)从1895年到1993年。支持这一假设的是,加权元回归模型显示,经对数转换的非父认定率随发表年份显著下降(r = -0.41),并且随非父认定事件的估计年份也有所下降,尽管不显著(r = -0.17)。这些结果转化为未经转换的非父认定率每十年分别估计绝对下降0.83%和0.91%。在各项研究中,非父认定率的平均值(和中位数)为3.1%(2.1%)。这一估计与近期基于较少原始研究的该主题综述中2%至3%的估计一致。这一估计也反驳了公众和研究人员中广泛存在的观点和传闻数据,这些观点和数据认为现代人群中的非父认定率可能高达约10%。