• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手助腹腔镜与开腹手术在结直肠外科中的应用:系统评价。

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2010 Apr;12(4):287-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01827.x. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01827.x
PMID:19320665
Abstract

AIM

This systematic review was performed to answer the question whether hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) can preserve the advantages of laparoscopic compared with open surgery in colorectal disease.

METHOD

Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Embase Cochrane) and cross-reference search. The database search, quality assessment and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Outcome criteria were operative time, number of trocars used, conversion rate, incision length, blood loss, time to passage of flatus, use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, number of lymph nodes and costs.

RESULTS

Out of 162 publications seven publications were selected for comprehensive review. Three randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four non-RCTs, comprising 571 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Because of heterogeneity, the data could not be pooled. The operative time was significantly longer in HALS in four of the seven studies (addition in median operative time of 13-81 min). The conversion rate varied from 0 to 10%. Two of the four reporting studies demonstrated a significantly shorter time to passage of flatus in HALS (averagely one day in advance). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in HALS in four of the seven studies (average gain between 2 and 4 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery while reducing some of the disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery (shorter operative time, lower conversion rates). Especially for indications in which an incision to extract the resection specimen is required, HALS provides an excellent treatment option.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在回答手助腹腔镜手术(HALS)是否可以保留腹腔镜手术相对于开腹手术在结直肠疾病中的优势。

方法

从电子数据库(Medline、Embase Cochrane)和交叉引用搜索中确定合格的研究。数据库搜索、质量评估和数据提取由两名评审员独立进行。结局指标为手术时间、使用的套管针数量、中转率、切口长度、出血量、排气时间、镇痛药使用、术后发病率、住院死亡率、住院时间、淋巴结数量和成本。

结果

在 162 篇文献中,有 7 篇文献进行了全面综述。3 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 4 项非 RCT 共纳入 571 例患者,符合纳入标准。由于异质性,数据无法合并。在 7 项研究中的 4 项研究中,HALS 的手术时间明显延长(中位数手术时间增加 13-81 分钟)。中转率从 0 到 10%不等。报告的 4 项研究中有 2 项表明 HALS 的排气时间明显缩短(平均提前一天)。7 项研究中的 4 项研究表明 HALS 的住院时间明显缩短(平均缩短 2-4 天)。

结论

HALS 具有腹腔镜手术相对于开腹手术的优势,同时减少了腹腔镜手术的一些缺点(手术时间更短,中转率更低)。对于需要切口取出切除标本的适应证,HALS 提供了一种极好的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review.手助腹腔镜与开腹手术在结直肠外科中的应用:系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Apr;12(4):287-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01827.x. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
2
Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠手术中的手辅助或腹腔镜辅助入路:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Aug;22(8):1769-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9857-4. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
3
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
4
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
5
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
6
Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.腹腔镜结直肠切除术的短期益处。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2.
7
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗结直肠癌的术中及术后结果:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7794. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007794.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
9
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
10
Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 25;11(11):CD009277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive, robotic and open approaches in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.微创手术、机器人手术和开放手术治疗结直肠肿瘤的成本效果比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 29;38(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04361-5.
2
Hand Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes from a Single Tertiary Referral Centre.结直肠癌的手辅助腹腔镜手术:来自单一三级转诊中心的手术及肿瘤学结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 29;11(13):3781. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133781.
3
Sequential Approach for a Critical-View COlectomy (SACCO): A Laparoscopic Technique to Reduce Operative Time and Complications in IBD Acute Severe Colitis.
用于关键视野结肠切除术的序贯方法(SACCO):一种减少炎症性肠病急性重症结肠炎手术时间和并发症的腹腔镜技术
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 21;9(10):3382. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103382.
4
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗结直肠癌的术中及术后结果:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7794. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007794.
5
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.
6
Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si.达芬奇 Xi 和 Si 机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:短期手术和功能结局的病例匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):589-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5708-5. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colectomy Improves Perioperative Outcomes Without Increasing Operative Time Compared to the Open Approach: a National Analysis of 8791 Patients.与开放手术相比,手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术可改善围手术期结局且不增加手术时间:一项对8791例患者的全国性分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Apr;21(4):684-691. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3350-5. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
8
Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.手辅助腹腔镜溃疡性结肠炎全结肠直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Aug 27;8(8):578-82. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i8.578.
9
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations.腹腔镜结直肠手术:现状与最新技术创新的应用
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 14;22(2):704-17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.704.
10
Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术:所有腹腔镜技术都一样吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3567-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4654-3. Epub 2015 Nov 5.