Lee C C, Adler A I, Sandhu M S, Sharp S J, Forouhi N G, Erqou S, Luben R, Bingham S, Khaw K T, Wareham N J
MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Diabetologia. 2009 Jun;52(6):1040-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1338-3. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined the association between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and incident diabetes in a prospective study, and added these data to a literature-based meta-analysis to explore potential sources of heterogeneity between studies.
We analysed a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk cohort, including 293 incident diabetes cases and 708 controls. We combined 16 published studies on CRP and incident diabetes in a random-effect meta-analysis.
In the EPIC-Norfolk cohort, serum CRP was associated with a higher risk of diabetes after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, family history of diabetes, smoking and physical activity (OR 1.49, comparing the extreme thirds of CRP distribution [95% CI 1.03-2.15], p = 0.03). However, the association was completely attenuated after further adjustment for WHR, serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and serum adiponectin (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.66-1.51, p = 1.0). In a meta-analysis of 16 published studies with 3,920 incident diabetes cases and 24,914 controls, the RR was 1.72 (95% CI 1.54-1.92), comparing the extreme thirds of CRP distribution, with substantial heterogeneity between studies (I (2) = 52.8%, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Initial evidence of association between CRP and incident diabetes was confounded by central adiposity, markers of liver dysfunction and adiponectin in the primary analysis. Despite an overall positive association in the meta-analysis, considerable heterogeneity existed between studies. The degree of adjustment for central adiposity and baseline glycaemia explained some of this heterogeneity and suggests that CRP may not be an independent risk factor for type 2 diabetes.
目的/假设:在一项前瞻性研究中,我们检测了血清C反应蛋白(CRP)与新发糖尿病之间的关联,并将这些数据纳入基于文献的荟萃分析,以探索研究之间潜在的异质性来源。
我们分析了嵌套于欧洲癌症前瞻性调查(EPIC)-诺福克队列中的一项病例对照研究,包括293例新发糖尿病病例和708例对照。我们将16项已发表的关于CRP与新发糖尿病的研究纳入随机效应荟萃分析。
在EPIC-诺福克队列中,在校正年龄、性别、体重指数、糖尿病家族史、吸烟和体力活动后,血清CRP与糖尿病风险较高相关(OR 1.49,比较CRP分布的极端三分位数[95%CI 1.03-2.15],p = 0.03)。然而,在进一步校正腰臀比、血清γ-谷氨酰转移酶和血清脂联素后,该关联完全减弱(OR 1.00;95%CI 0.66-1.51,p = 1.0)。在对16项已发表研究(3920例新发糖尿病病例和24914例对照)的荟萃分析中,比较CRP分布的极端三分位数时,RR为1.72(95%CI 1.54-1.92),研究之间存在显著异质性(I² = 52.8%,p = 0.007)。
结论/解读:在初步分析中,CRP与新发糖尿病之间关联的初步证据受到中心性肥胖、肝功能标志物和脂联素的混杂影响。尽管在荟萃分析中总体呈正相关,但研究之间存在相当大的异质性。对中心性肥胖和基线血糖的校正程度解释了部分这种异质性,并表明CRP可能不是2型糖尿病的独立危险因素。