Kouroupis Dimitrios, Zografou Ioanna, Balaska Aikaterini, Reklou Andromachi, Varouktsi Anna, Paschala Anastasia, Pyrpasopoulou Athina, Stavropoulos Konstantinos, Vogiatzis Konstantinos, Sarvani Anastasia, Doukelis Panagiotis, Karangelis Dimos, Dimakopoulos Georgios, Kotsa Kalliopi, Doumas Michael, Koufakis Theocharis
Second Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Internal Medicine, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, 570 10 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 29;12(9):1960. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091960.
Systemic inflammation has been recognized as the cause and consequence of metabolic dysregulation in diabetes mellitus (DM). Presepsin has recently emerged as a promising biomarker for the detection of bacterial infections and sepsis. There is evidence that gut dysbiosis results in the increased circulating concentrations of Gram-negative bacteria lipopolysaccharide, the linkage of presepsin, which in turn promotes insulin resistance and correlates with the risk of diabetic complications. Thus, we hypothesized that presepsin could reflect the magnitude of systemic inflammation and metabolic decompensation in patients with DM even in the absence of infection. In this cross-sectional pilot study, we included 75 infection-free individuals with well-controlled ( = 19) and uncontrolled ( = 23) type 2 diabetes (T2D), well-controlled ( = 10) and uncontrolled ( = 10) type 1 diabetes (T1D), and normoglycemic controls ( = 13). Presepsin levels were compared between the groups and potential associations with demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were explored. We observed that the duration of DM was associated with presepsin values ( = 0.008). When the participants were classified into the type of DM groups, the presepsin levels were found to be lower in the patients with T2D compared to those with T1D ( = 0.008). However, significance in that case was driven by the difference between the well-controlled groups. After adjusting for the effects of DM duration, presepsin was significantly lower in the well-controlled T2D group compared to the well-controlled T1D group [1.34 (2.02) vs. 2.22 (4.20) ng/mL, = 0.01]. Furthermore, we adjusted our findings for various confounders, including age, body mass index, and waist circumference, and found that the difference in the presepsin values between the adequately controlled groups remained significant ( = 0.048). In conclusion, our findings suggest that presepsin could potentially serve as a surrogate marker of inflammation and metabolic control in people with DM.
全身炎症已被认为是糖尿病(DM)代谢失调的原因和结果。可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1(Presepsin)最近已成为检测细菌感染和脓毒症的一种很有前景的生物标志物。有证据表明,肠道菌群失调会导致革兰氏阴性菌脂多糖循环浓度升高,这是Presepsin的联系物,进而促进胰岛素抵抗,并与糖尿病并发症风险相关。因此,我们推测,即使在没有感染的情况下,Presepsin也可以反映DM患者全身炎症的程度和代谢失代偿情况。在这项横断面初步研究中,我们纳入了75名无感染个体,其中包括血糖控制良好的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者(n = 19)和血糖控制不佳的患者(n = 23)、血糖控制良好的1型糖尿病(T1D)患者(n = 10)和血糖控制不佳的患者(n = 10),以及血糖正常对照组(n = 13)。比较了各组之间的Presepsin水平,并探讨了其与人口统计学、临床和实验室参数的潜在关联。我们观察到DM病程与Presepsin值相关(P = 0.008)。当将参与者按DM类型分组时,发现T2D患者的Presepsin水平低于T1D患者(P = 0.008)。然而,这种情况下的显著性是由血糖控制良好组之间的差异驱动的。在调整DM病程的影响后,血糖控制良好的T2D组的Presepsin显著低于血糖控制良好的T1D组[1.34(2.02)对2.22(4.20)ng/mL,P = 0.01]。此外,我们针对包括年龄、体重指数和腰围在内的各种混杂因素对我们的研究结果进行了调整,发现血糖控制充分的组之间Presepsin值的差异仍然显著(P = 0.048)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,Presepsin可能潜在地作为DM患者炎症和代谢控制的替代标志物。