• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重创伤性脑损伤患者在挪威区域性创伤中心的治疗限制决策。

Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in a Norwegian regional trauma center.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, P.O.Box 4950, Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Apr 26;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0385-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13049-017-0385-x
PMID:28441973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5405474/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment-limiting decisions (TLD) for severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) have been sparsely studied. This study determine prevalence, main reason for, categories and timing of TLDs in a Norwegian regional trauma setting.

METHODS

A retrospective study of a 2-year cohort of 579 sTBI patients admitted to Oslo University Hospital (OUH). Prospectively collected data in the OUH Trauma Registry were combined with retrospective data from a chart review regarding TLDs.

RESULTS

TLDs were documented for 101/579 sTBI patients (17%). The situation was evaluated as futile in 59 cases and as potentially inappropriate in 42 cases. The three most frequent types of TLDs were withholding of neurosurgery, do not resuscitate orders and withdrawing of organ support. In 70% of cases, the first TLD was made within 2 days after injury, while in 14%, the first TLD was made later than day 7. Twenty percent (20/101) of the first TLDs were later adjusted, revoked in 4 patients and broadening of TLDs in 16 patients. The median time from the decision to death was 2 days (range 1-652). TLDs were documented in 93% of in-hospital death cases (n = 79). In-hospital deaths occurred in 73% of TLD group cases and 1% of non-TLD group cases. Family interaction and multi-team discussions were documented in >88% of cases, but no advanced directives were found, and notifications of patients' preferences were found in only 7% of cases.

DISCUSSION

Clinicians should consider limiting treatment if continued treatment is not in the patients best interest. A range of different types of TLDs were applied for patients after sTBI in the trauma hospital setting.

CONCLUSION

TLDs were found in 17% of sTBI patients. Value considerations behind TLDs in this care context need to be further explored.

摘要

背景

对于严重创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)的治疗限制决策(TLD)研究甚少。本研究旨在确定挪威区域性创伤环境中 TLD 的发生率、主要原因、类别和时间。

方法

对入住奥斯陆大学医院(OUH)的 579 例 sTBI 患者进行了为期 2 年的队列回顾性研究。OUH 创伤登记处前瞻性收集的数据与 TLD 回顾性图表审查数据相结合。

结果

记录了 101/579 例 sTBI 患者(17%)的 TLD。59 例被评估为无效,42 例被评估为可能不适当。三种最常见的 TLD 类型是神经外科手术的回避、不复苏医嘱和器官支持的撤回。70%的情况下,第一次 TLD 在损伤后 2 天内做出,而 14%的情况下,第一次 TLD 在第 7 天以后做出。20%(20/101)的第一次 TLD 后来进行了调整,4 例被撤销,16 例扩大了 TLD。从决定到死亡的中位数时间为 2 天(范围 1-652)。TLD 记录在 93%的院内死亡病例(n=79)中。TLD 组的院内死亡发生率为 73%,非 TLD 组的院内死亡发生率为 1%。在超过 88%的病例中记录了家庭互动和多团队讨论,但未发现预先指示,只有 7%的病例中发现了通知患者偏好的记录。

讨论

如果继续治疗不符合患者的最佳利益,临床医生应考虑限制治疗。在创伤医院环境中,对 sTBI 患者应用了一系列不同类型的 TLD。

结论

在 sTBI 患者中发现了 17%的 TLD。需要进一步探讨这种治疗背景下 TLD 背后的价值考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d1/5405474/820f45eb816a/13049_2017_385_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d1/5405474/820f45eb816a/13049_2017_385_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d1/5405474/820f45eb816a/13049_2017_385_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in a Norwegian regional trauma center.严重创伤性脑损伤患者在挪威区域性创伤中心的治疗限制决策。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Apr 26;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0385-x.
2
Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the Netherlands.荷兰重度创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗限制决策
Brain Spine. 2024 Jan 3;4:102746. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102746. eCollection 2024.
3
Withdrawal of Life-supporting Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者的生命支持治疗的撤离。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 1;155(8):723-731. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1790.
4
Big children or little adults? A statewide analysis of adolescent isolated severe traumatic brain injury outcomes at pediatric versus adult trauma centers.大孩子还是小大人?一项针对儿科与成人创伤中心青少年孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤结局的全州范围分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):368-373. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001291.
5
Increased trends in the use of treatment-limiting decisions in a regional neurosurgical unit.某地区神经外科单位中限制治疗决策使用的增加趋势。
Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;31(2):254-257. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1226259. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Treatment-Limiting Decisions in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.自发性脑出血患者的治疗限制决策。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 25;58(8):989. doi: 10.3390/medicina58080989.
7
Inter-physician variability in strategies linked to treatment limitations after severe traumatic brain injury; proactivity or wait-and-see.严重创伤性脑损伤后治疗限制相关策略的医生间变异性;主动还是观望。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00612-8.
8
The outcome of treatment limitation discussions in newborns with brain injury.脑损伤新生儿治疗限制讨论的结果
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Mar;100(2):F155-60. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307399. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
The cost of a pediatric neurocritical care program for traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.小儿创伤性脑损伤神经重症监护项目的成本:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2768-0.
10
Statin discontinuation and mortality in an older adult population with traumatic brain injury: A four-year, multi-centre, observational cohort study.老年创伤性脑损伤患者停用他汀类药物与死亡率:一项为期四年的多中心观察性队列研究。
Injury. 2017 May;48(5):1040-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the editor "Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the Netherlands".致编辑的信《荷兰严重创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗限制决策》
Brain Spine. 2024 Dec 9;5:104157. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104157. eCollection 2025.
2
Survival and predictive factors of clinical outcome in patients with severe acquired brain injury.严重获得性脑损伤患者的临床结局的生存和预测因素。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;60(4):597-603. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08430-2. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Factors influencing discharge against medical advice (DAMA) in traumatic brain injury patients requiring decompressive surgery: a comprehensive analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
A case for stopping the early withdrawal of life sustaining therapies in patients with devastating brain injuries.关于停止对严重脑损伤患者过早撤除维持生命疗法的案例。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Nov;17(4):295-301. doi: 10.1177/1751143716647980. Epub 2016 May 5.
2
Increased trends in the use of treatment-limiting decisions in a regional neurosurgical unit.某地区神经外科单位中限制治疗决策使用的增加趋势。
Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;31(2):254-257. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1226259. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Defining Futile and Potentially Inappropriate Interventions: A Policy Statement From the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee.
影响创伤性脑损伤患者接受减压手术后出院(DAMA)的因素:综合分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jun 7;47(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02499-6.
4
Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the Netherlands.荷兰重度创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗限制决策
Brain Spine. 2024 Jan 3;4:102746. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102746. eCollection 2024.
5
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in general hospitals: a ten-year population-based retrospective cohort study in central Norway.综合医院中的中重度创伤性脑损伤:挪威中部一项基于人群的十年回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 9;30(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01050-0.
6
Treatment-Limiting Decisions in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.自发性脑出血患者的治疗限制决策。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 25;58(8):989. doi: 10.3390/medicina58080989.
7
Craniotomies following acute traumatic brain injury in Finland-a national study between 1997 and 2018.芬兰急性创伤性脑损伤后的开颅手术:1997 年至 2018 年的全国性研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Mar;164(3):625-633. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05140-x. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
Incidence of emergency neurosurgical TBI procedures: a population-based study.紧急神经外科 TBI 手术的发生率:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00561-w.
9
Clinical and Physiologic Factors Associated With Mode of Death in Pediatric Severe TBI.小儿重型创伤性脑损伤死亡方式相关的临床和生理因素
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 13;9:793008. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.793008. eCollection 2021.
10
Inter-physician variability in strategies linked to treatment limitations after severe traumatic brain injury; proactivity or wait-and-see.严重创伤性脑损伤后治疗限制相关策略的医生间变异性;主动还是观望。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00612-8.
界定无效和潜在不适当的干预措施:危重病医学学会伦理委员会的政策声明
Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):1769-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001965.
4
Addressing uncertainty: what is the role of consensus in end-of-life care?应对不确定性:共识在临终关怀中扮演着怎样的角色?
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;42(6):1043-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4336-1. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Neurocritical Care Society Views on "Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units".神经重症监护学会对“重症监护病房中潜在不适当治疗”的看法。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 15;193(4):466-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201510-2086LE.
6
The impact of the Rasouli decision: a Survey of Canadian intensivists.拉苏利案判决的影响:对加拿大重症监护医生的一项调查。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):180-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102856. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Integrating Palliative Care Into the Care of Neurocritically Ill Patients: A Report From the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU Project Advisory Board and the Center to Advance Palliative Care.将姑息治疗融入神经危重症患者的护理:来自重症监护病房改善姑息治疗项目咨询委员会及姑息治疗推进中心的报告
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1964-77. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001131.
8
Patient Preferences and Surrogate Decision Making in Neuroscience Intensive Care Units.神经重症监护病房中的患者偏好与替代决策制定
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):131-41. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0149-2.
9
An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: Responding to Requests for Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units.美国胸科学会/美国护理学会/美国胸科医师学会/欧洲危重病医学会/重症医学会联合政策声明:在重症监护病房中应对潜在不适当治疗的请求。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jun 1;191(11):1318-30. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0924ST.
10
Recommendations for the Critical Care Management of Devastating Brain Injury: Prognostication, Psychosocial, and Ethical Management : A Position Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.严重脑损伤的重症监护管理建议:预后评估、心理社会及伦理管理:神经重症监护学会给医疗专业人员的立场声明
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):4-13. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0137-6.