Suppr超能文献

危重症患者常见侵入性技术使用模式的时间序列分析

Time series analysis of use patterns for common invasive technologies in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Berthiaume Luc R, Peets Adam D, Schmidt Ulrich, Shahpori Reza, Doig Chip J, Boiteau Paul J E, Stelfox Henry Thomas

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;24(3):471.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.07.004. Epub 2009 Jan 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Critically ill patients are frequently managed with invasive technologies as part of their medical care. Little is known about use patterns. We examined use trends for invasive technologies used in critically ill patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using time series analysis and data on 26 989 patients from 3 medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) (n = 18 224) and 1 surgical ICU (n = 8765) between January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2007, we measured changes in the proportion of patients receiving the 4 most frequently used invasive technologies used in critically ill patients.

RESULTS

The 4 most common invasive technologies used in critically ill patients during the study period were arterial lines (71%), endotracheal intubations (61%), central venous catheters (51%), and pulmonary artery catheters (18%). The proportion of ICU patients who received pulmonary artery catheters decreased from 25% in 1999 to 8% in 2006 (P < .001). Use of central venous catheters increased from 39% to 46% (P < .001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients admitted in 2006 were 4 times less likely to receive a pulmonary artery catheter (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.33), but 42% (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.58) more likely to receive a central venous catheter than patients admitted in 1999. No significant changes were observed for intubations and arterial lines.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of invasive technologies in critically ill patients is changing and may have important implications for resource use, clinician education, and patient care. Initiatives should be considered for ensuring clinician competency during technology transitions.

摘要

目的

重症患者在医疗护理中常采用侵入性技术。对于其使用模式了解甚少。我们研究了重症患者使用侵入性技术的趋势。

材料与方法

利用时间序列分析以及1999年1月1日至2007年1月1日期间来自3个内科 - 外科重症监护病房(ICU)(n = 18224)和1个外科ICU(n = 8765)的26989例患者的数据,我们测量了接受重症患者最常用的4种侵入性技术的患者比例变化。

结果

研究期间重症患者使用的4种最常见侵入性技术为动脉导管(71%)、气管插管(61%)、中心静脉导管(51%)和肺动脉导管(18%)。接受肺动脉导管的ICU患者比例从1999年的25%降至2006年的8%(P <.001)。中心静脉导管的使用从39%增加到46%(P <.001)。在调整基线特征后,2006年入院的患者接受肺动脉导管的可能性比1999年入院的患者低4倍(优势比,0.28;95%置信区间,0.24 - 0.33),但接受中心静脉导管的可能性比1999年入院的患者高42%(优势比,1.42;95%置信区间,1.27 - 1.58)。气管插管和动脉导管未观察到显著变化。

结论

重症患者侵入性技术的使用正在发生变化,可能对资源利用、临床医生教育和患者护理产生重要影响。在技术转变期间应考虑采取措施确保临床医生的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验