Gogia Siddhartha, Sachdev Harshpal Singh
Department of Paediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, B-16 Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi 110016, India.
BMJ. 2009 Mar 27;338:b919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b919.
To evaluate the effect of neonatal vitamin A supplementation on infant mortality, morbidity and early adverse effects.
Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.
Electronic databases and hand search of reviews; abstracts and proceedings of conferences. Review methods Randomised or quasi-randomised or cluster randomised, placebo controlled trials evaluating the effect of prophylactic, neonatal (<1 month) supplementation with synthetic vitamin A on mortality or morbidity within infancy (<1 year), and early adverse effects (</=7 days).
The six included trials were from developing countries. There was no convincing evidence of a reduced risk of mortality during infancy (relative risk 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.12, P=0.393 random effect; I(2)=54.1%) or of an increase in early adverse effects including bulging fontanelle (1.16, 0.81 to 1.65, P=0.418; I(2)=65.3%). No variable emerged as a significant predictor of mortality, but data for important risk groups (high maternal night blindness prevalence and low birth weights) were restricted. Limited data (from one to four trials) did not indicate a reduced risk of mortality during the neonatal period (0.90, 0.75 to 1.08, P=0.270; I(2)=0%), cause specific mortality, common morbidities (diarrhoea and others), and admission to hospital. There was, however, evidence of an increased risk of acute respiratory infection and a reduced risk of clinic visits.
There is no convincing evidence of a reduced risk of mortality and possibly morbidity or of increased early adverse effects after neonatal supplementation with vitamin A. There is thus no justification for initiating such supplementation as a public health intervention in developing countries for reducing infant mortality and morbidity.
评估新生儿补充维生素A对婴儿死亡率、发病率及早期不良反应的影响。
对随机对照试验进行系统评价、荟萃分析及荟萃回归分析。
电子数据库及对综述的手工检索;会议摘要及论文集。综述方法:随机或半随机或整群随机、安慰剂对照试验,评估预防性、新生儿期(<1个月)补充合成维生素A对婴儿期(<1岁)死亡率或发病率以及早期不良反应(≤7天)的影响。
纳入的6项试验均来自发展中国家。没有令人信服的证据表明婴儿期死亡率风险降低(相对风险0.92,95%置信区间0.75至1.12,P=0.393,随机效应;I²=54.1%),也没有证据表明早期不良反应增加,包括囟门隆起(1.16,0.81至1.65,P=0.418;I²=65.3%)。没有变量成为死亡率的显著预测因素,但重要风险组(母亲夜盲症患病率高和低出生体重)的数据有限。有限的数据(来自1至4项试验)未表明新生儿期死亡率风险降低(0.90,0.75至1.08,P=0.270;I²=0%)、特定病因死亡率、常见疾病(腹泻等)以及住院风险降低。然而,有证据表明急性呼吸道感染风险增加,门诊就诊风险降低。
没有令人信服的证据表明新生儿补充维生素A后死亡率风险降低,也可能没有发病率降低或早期不良反应增加的情况。因此,在发展中国家将这种补充作为降低婴儿死亡率和发病率的公共卫生干预措施没有依据。