Imdad Aamer, Mayo-Wilson Evan, Herzer Kurt, Bhutta Zulfiqar A
Department of Pediatrics, D. Brent Polk Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA, 37212.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 21205.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 11;3(3):CD008524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008524.pub3.
Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is a major public health problem in low- and middle-income countries, affecting 190 million children under five years of age and leading to many adverse health consequences, including death. Based on prior evidence and a previous version of this review, the World Health Organization has continued to recommend vitamin A supplementation for children aged 6 to 59 months. There are new data available from recently published randomised trials since the previous publication of this review in 2010, and this update incorporates this information and reviews the evidence.
To assess the effects of vitamin A supplementation (VAS) for preventing morbidity and mortality in children aged six months to five years.
In March 2016 we searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases, and two trials registers. We also checked reference lists and contacted relevant organisations and researchers to identify additional studies.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs evaluating the effect of synthetic VAS in children aged six months to five years living in the community. We excluded studies involving children in hospital and children with disease or infection. We also excluded studies evaluating the effects of food fortification, consumption of vitamin A rich foods, or beta-carotene supplementation.
For this update, two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and abstracted data, resolving discrepancies by discussion. We performed meta-analyses for outcomes, including all-cause and cause-specific mortality, disease, vision, and side effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence.
We identified 47 studies (4 of which are new to this review), involving approximately 1,223,856 children. Studies took place in 19 countries: 30 (63%) in Asia, 16 of these in India; 8 (17%) in Africa; 7 (15%) in Latin America, and 2 (4%) in Australia. About one-third of the studies were in urban/periurban settings, and half were in rural settings; the remaining studies did not clearly report settings. Most of the studies included equal numbers of girls and boys and lasted about a year. The included studies were at variable overall risk of bias; however, evidence for the primary outcome was at low risk of bias. A meta-analysis for all-cause mortality included 19 trials (1,202,382 children). At longest follow-up, there was a 12% observed reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality for vitamin A compared with control using a fixed-effect model (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.93; high-quality evidence). This result was sensitive to choice of model, and a random-effects meta-analysis showed a different summary estimate (24% reduction: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88); however, the confidence intervals overlapped with that of the fixed-effect model. Nine trials reported mortality due to diarrhoea and showed a 12% overall reduction for VAS (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.98; 1,098,538 participants; high-quality evidence). There was no significant effect for VAS on mortality due to measles, respiratory disease, and meningitis. VAS reduced incidence of diarrhoea (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.87; 15 studies; 77,946 participants; low-quality evidence) and measles (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.67; 6 studies; 19,566 participants; moderate-quality evidence). However, there was no significant effect on incidence of respiratory disease or hospitalisations due to diarrhoea or pneumonia. There was an increased risk of vomiting within the first 48 hours of VAS (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.69; 4 studies; 10,541 participants; moderate-quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin A supplementation is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in morbidity and mortality in children. Therefore, we suggest maintaining the policy of universal supplementation for children under five years of age in populations at risk of VAD. Further placebo-controlled trials of VAS in children between six months and five years of age would not change the conclusions of this review, although studies that compare different doses and delivery mechanisms are needed. In populations with documented vitamin A deficiency, it would be unethical to conduct placebo-controlled trials.
维生素A缺乏症(VAD)是低收入和中等收入国家的一个主要公共卫生问题,影响着1.9亿五岁以下儿童,并导致许多不良健康后果,包括死亡。基于先前的证据和本综述的上一版本,世界卫生组织继续建议对6至59个月大的儿童补充维生素A。自本综述于2010年上次发表以来,有来自最近发表的随机试验的新数据,本次更新纳入了这些信息并对证据进行了综述。
评估补充维生素A(VAS)对预防6个月至5岁儿童发病和死亡的效果。
2016年3月,我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、其他六个数据库以及两个试验注册库。我们还检查了参考文献列表,并联系了相关组织和研究人员以识别其他研究。
评估合成VAS对社区中6个月至5岁儿童效果的随机对照试验(RCT)和整群RCT。我们排除了涉及住院儿童以及患有疾病或感染儿童的研究。我们还排除了评估食物强化、富含维生素A食物的消费或补充β-胡萝卜素效果的研究。
对于本次更新,两名综述作者独立评估研究是否纳入并提取数据,通过讨论解决分歧。我们对包括全因和特定原因死亡率、疾病、视力及副作用等结局进行了荟萃分析。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。
我们识别出47项研究(其中4项是本次综述新增的),涉及约1,223,856名儿童。研究在19个国家进行:亚洲30项(63%),其中16项在印度;非洲8项(17%);拉丁美洲7项(15%);澳大利亚2项(4%)。约三分之一的研究在城市/城郊地区进行,一半在农村地区;其余研究未明确报告地区。大多数研究纳入的男女孩数量相等,持续时间约为一年。纳入的研究总体偏倚风险各异;然而,主要结局的证据偏倚风险较低。全因死亡率的荟萃分析纳入了19项试验(1,202,382名儿童)。在最长随访期,使用固定效应模型时,与对照组相比,维生素A组全因死亡率风险观察到降低12%(风险比(RR)0.88,95%置信区间(CI)0.83至0.93;高质量证据)。该结果对模型选择敏感,随机效应荟萃分析显示了不同的汇总估计(降低24%:RR 0.76,95% CI 0.66至0.88);然而,置信区间与固定效应模型的重叠。9项试验报告了腹泻导致的死亡,显示VAS总体降低12%(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.79至0.98;1,098,538名参与者;高质量证据)。VAS对麻疹、呼吸道疾病和脑膜炎导致的死亡率无显著影响。VAS降低了腹泻发病率(RR 0.85,95% CI 0.82至0.87;15项研究;77,946名参与者;低质量证据)和麻疹发病率(RR 0.50,95% CI 0.37至0.67;6项研究;19,566名参与者;中等质量证据)。然而,对呼吸道疾病发病率或腹泻或肺炎导致的住院率无显著影响。VAS在开始后48小时内呕吐风险增加(RR 1.97,95% CI 1.44至2.69;4项研究;10,541名参与者;中等质量证据)。
补充维生素A与儿童发病和死亡的临床显著降低相关。因此,我们建议在有VAD风险的人群中维持对五岁以下儿童普遍补充的政策。尽管需要比较不同剂量和给药机制的研究,但6个月至5岁儿童中进一步的VAS安慰剂对照试验不会改变本综述的结论。在有记录的维生素A缺乏人群中进行安慰剂对照试验是不道德的。