Mieszkin Sophie, Furet Jean-Pierre, Corthier Gérard, Gourmelon Michèle
Ifremer EMP, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, 29280 Plouzané, France.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(10):3045-54. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02343-08. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
The microbiological quality of coastal or river water can be affected by fecal contamination from human or animal sources. To discriminate pig fecal pollution from other pollution, a library-independent microbial source tracking method targeting Bacteroidales host-specific 16S rRNA gene markers by real-time PCR was designed. Two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers (Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac) were designed using 16S rRNA gene Bacteroidales clone libraries from pig feces and slurry. For these two pig markers, 98 to 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity were obtained when tested by TaqMan real-time PCR. A decrease in the concentrations of Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac markers was observed throughout the slurry treatment chain. The two newly designed pig-specific Bacteroidales markers, plus the human-specific (HF183) and ruminant-specific (BacR) Bacteroidales markers, were then applied to river water samples (n = 24) representing 14 different sites from the French Daoulas River catchment (Brittany, France). Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac were quantified in 25% and 62.5%, respectively, of samples collected around pig farms, with concentrations ranging from 3.6 to 4.1 log10 copies per 100 ml of water. They were detected in water samples collected downstream from pig farms but never detected near cattle farms. HF183 was quantified in 90% of water samples collected downstream near Daoulas town, with concentrations ranging between 3.6 and 4.4 log10 copies per 100 ml of water, and BacR in all water samples collected around cattle farms, with concentrations ranging between 4.6 and 6.0 log10 copies per 100 ml of water. The results of this study highlight that pig fecal contamination was not as frequent as human or bovine fecal contamination and that fecal pollution generally came from multiple origins. The two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers can be applied to environmental water samples to detect pig fecal pollution.
沿海或河流水体的微生物质量可能会受到来自人类或动物源的粪便污染的影响。为了区分猪粪便污染与其他污染,设计了一种基于非文库的微生物源追踪方法,通过实时PCR靶向拟杆菌目宿主特异性16S rRNA基因标记。利用来自猪粪便和猪粪浆的16S rRNA基因拟杆菌目克隆文库设计了两种猪特异性拟杆菌目标记(Pig-1-Bac和Pig-2-Bac)。对于这两种猪标记,通过TaqMan实时PCR检测时,获得了98%至100%的灵敏度和100%的特异性。在整个猪粪浆处理链中,观察到Pig-1-Bac和Pig-2-Bac标记的浓度有所下降。然后,将这两种新设计的猪特异性拟杆菌目标记,加上人类特异性(HF183)和反刍动物特异性(BacR)拟杆菌目标记,应用于代表法国道拉斯河流域(法国布列塔尼)14个不同地点的河水样本(n = 24)。在养猪场周围采集的样本中,分别有25%和62.5%检测到了Pig-1-Bac和Pig-2-Bac,浓度范围为每100毫升水3.6至4.1 log10拷贝。在养猪场下游采集的水样中检测到了它们,但在养牛场附近从未检测到。在道拉斯镇下游附近采集的90%的水样中检测到了HF183,浓度范围为每100毫升水3.6至4.4 log10拷贝,在养牛场周围采集的所有水样中都检测到了BacR,浓度范围为每100毫升水4.6至6.0 log10拷贝。这项研究的结果突出表明,猪粪便污染不如人类或牛粪便污染频繁,而且粪便污染通常来自多个源头。这两种猪特异性拟杆菌目标记可应用于环境水样以检测猪粪便污染。