Savichtcheva Olga, Okayama Noriko, Okabe Satoshi
Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan.
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3615-28. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.028. Epub 2007 May 15.
Occurrence and prevalence of different bacterial enteric pathogens as well as their relationships with conventional (total and fecal coliforms) and alternative fecal indicators (host-specific Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic markers) were investigated for various water samples taken from different sites with different degrees of fecal contamination. The results showed that a wide range of bacterial pathogens could be detected in both municipal wastewater treatment plant samples and in surface water samples. Logistic regression analysis revealed that total and human-specific Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic markers showed significant predictive values for the presence of Escheriachia coli O-157, Salmonella, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) of enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and heat-stable enterotoxin for human (STh) of ETEC. The probability of occurrence of these pathogenic bacteria became significantly high when the concentrations of human-specific and total Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic markers exceeded 10(3) and 10(4) copies/100 mL. In contrast, Clostridium perfringens was detected at high frequency regardless of sampling sites and levels of Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic markers. No genes related to Shigella spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio cholerae were detected in any samples analyzed in this study. Conventional indicator microorganisms had low levels of correlation with the presence of pathogens as compared with the alternative fecal indicators. These results suggested that real-time PCR-based measurement of alternative Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic markers was a rapid and sensitive tool to identify host-specific fecal pollution and probably associated bacterial pathogens. However, since one fecal indicator might not represent the relative abundance of all pathogenic bacteria, viruses and protozoa, combined application of alternative indicators with conventional ones could provide more comprehensive pictures of fecal contamination, its source and association with pathogenic microorganisms.
对从不同程度粪便污染的不同地点采集的各种水样,研究了不同肠道细菌病原体的发生率和流行率,以及它们与传统(总大肠菌群和粪大肠菌群)和替代粪便指示物(宿主特异性拟杆菌16S rRNA基因标记)的关系。结果表明,在城市污水处理厂样品和地表水样中均能检测到多种细菌病原体。逻辑回归分析显示,总大肠菌群和人类特异性拟杆菌16S rRNA基因标记对大肠杆菌O-157、沙门氏菌、产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)的不耐热肠毒素(LT)和ETEC的人类耐热肠毒素(STh)的存在具有显著的预测价值。当人类特异性和总拟杆菌16S rRNA基因标记的浓度超过10(3)和10(4)拷贝/100 mL时,这些病原菌的发生概率显著升高。相比之下,无论采样地点和拟杆菌16S rRNA基因标记水平如何,产气荚膜梭菌的检出频率都很高。在本研究分析的任何样品中均未检测到与志贺氏菌属、金黄色葡萄球菌和霍乱弧菌相关的基因。与替代粪便指示物相比,传统指示微生物与病原体存在的相关性较低。这些结果表明,基于实时PCR的替代拟杆菌16S rRNA基因标记测量是一种快速、灵敏的工具,可用于识别宿主特异性粪便污染以及可能相关的细菌病原体。然而,由于一种粪便指示物可能无法代表所有病原菌、病毒和原生动物的相对丰度,将替代指示物与传统指示物联合应用可以提供更全面的粪便污染、其来源以及与致病微生物关联的情况。