Jesser Kelsey J, Alban Viviana, Lobos Aldo E, Gallard-Góngora Javier, Trueba Gabriel, Lee Gwenyth O, Eisenberg Joseph Ns, Harwood Valerie J, Levy Karen
University of Washington, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences.
Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Instituto de Microbiología.
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 23:2025.08.22.671888. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.22.671888.
Exposures to both human and animal feces pose human health risks, particularly for young children in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings where domestic animals are common, water and sanitation infrastructure is often limited, and enteropathogen transmission is high. Microbial source tracking (MST) markers specific to feces from humans and particular animal types can be used to identify the provenance of microbial contamination, yet most MST studies explore few household environmental sample types, limiting understanding of how marker utility varies by matrix. We validated qPCR assays for six MST markers and quantified their prevalence in 585 samples from 59 households spanning an urban-rural gradient in northwestern Ecuador. We used GenBac3 to test for general fecal contamination, and HF183, Rum2Bac, Pig2Bac, DG37, and GFD to test for human, ruminant, swine, dog, and avian contamination, respectively. Approximately 10 sample types were collected per household, including: rinses of child and adult hands, swabs of floors and surfaces, soil, domestic and drinking water, and food. GenBac3 and HF183 were detected in 77.82% and 15.36% of samples, respectively. Animal-associated markers were detected less frequently, in 0.5-4.1% of samples. However, when present, animal marker concentrations were comparable to HF183. Host-associated markers were most often detected in adult and child hand rinse and floor samples, and GenBac3 concentrations were highest in hand rinses. HF183 detection on adult caregiver hands was associated with increased odds of HF183 detection on children's hands and floors.
接触人类和动物粪便都会对人类健康构成风险,对于低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)环境中的幼儿而言尤其如此,这些国家常见家畜,水和卫生基础设施往往有限,肠道病原体传播率很高。特定于人类和特定动物类型粪便的微生物源追踪(MST)标记可用于识别微生物污染的来源,但大多数MST研究仅探索了少数几种家庭环境样本类型,限制了对标记物效用如何因基质而异的理解。我们验证了六种MST标记的qPCR检测方法,并对来自厄瓜多尔西北部城乡梯度的59户家庭的585个样本中这些标记的流行情况进行了量化。我们使用GenBac3检测一般粪便污染,使用HF183、Rum2Bac、Pig2Bac、DG37和GFD分别检测人类、反刍动物、猪、狗和禽类污染。每户大约收集10种样本类型,包括:儿童和成人手部冲洗液、地板和表面拭子、土壤、生活用水和饮用水以及食物。分别在77.82%和15.36%的样本中检测到GenBac3和HF183。与动物相关的标记物检测频率较低,在0.5%-4.1%的样本中被检测到。然而,当存在时,动物标记物的浓度与HF183相当。宿主相关标记物最常在成人和儿童手部冲洗液以及地板样本中被检测到,GenBac3浓度在手部冲洗液中最高。成人护理人员手部检测到HF183与儿童手部和地板上检测到HF183的几率增加有关。