Dal Negro Robert W, Borderias Luis, Zhang Qiaoyi, Fan Tao, Sazonov Vasilisa, Guilera Magda, Taylor Stephanie D
Bussolengo Gen. Hospital, Verona, Italy.
BMC Pulm Med. 2009 Mar 30;9:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-10.
Differences could exist in the likelihood of asthma attacks in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting beta-agonist (LABA), and montelukast (MON) (ICS/LABA/MON) and patients treated with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and montelukast (MON) (ICS/MON).
This was a post-hoc analysis of a pretest-posttest retrospective cohort study. Patients with mild persistent asthma and allergic rhinitis, who were taking an ICS either alone or in combination with a LABA, started concomitant MON treatment as part of their routine care. Rates of asthma- and allergic rhinitis-related medical resource use in the 12-months after the initial (index) MON prescription were compared in the ICS/MON and ICS/LABA/MON groups. An asthma attack was defined as an asthma-related hospitalization, ER visit, or use of an oral corticosteroid.
Of the total of 344 patients, 181 (53%) received ICS/MON and 163 (47%) received ICS/LABA/MON in the post-index period for means of 10.5 and 11.4 months, respectively, (P < 0.05). Short-acting beta-agonists were used by 74.6% in the ICS/MON and 71.8% in the ICS/LABA/MON groups (P > 0.05). An asthma attack occurred in 4.4% of the ICS/MON group and 6.8% of the ICS/LABA/MON group (P > 0.05). The adjusted odds of an asthma attack in the post-index period in the ICS/LABA/MON group relative to the ICS/MON group was 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.35-4.44.
In this observational study of combination drug treatment of mild persistent asthma and allergic rhinitis, no difference was observed between LABA/ICS/MON combination therapy and the ICS/MON combination without LABA use, for the rate of asthma attacks over one year.
吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)、长效β受体激动剂(LABA)和孟鲁司特(MON)联合治疗的患者(ICS/LABA/MON)与吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)和孟鲁司特(MON)联合治疗的患者(ICS/MON)在哮喘发作可能性上可能存在差异。
这是一项前后测回顾性队列研究的事后分析。患有轻度持续性哮喘和过敏性鼻炎且正在单独使用ICS或与LABA联合使用ICS的患者,开始将联合使用MON治疗作为其常规治疗的一部分。比较了ICS/MON组和ICS/LABA/MON组在初始(索引)MON处方后12个月内与哮喘和过敏性鼻炎相关的医疗资源使用情况。哮喘发作定义为与哮喘相关的住院、急诊就诊或使用口服糖皮质激素。
在总共344例患者中,181例(53%)在索引期后接受ICS/MON治疗,163例(47%)接受ICS/LABA/MON治疗,平均治疗时间分别为10.5个月和11.4个月(P < 0.05)。ICS/MON组中74.6%的患者使用了短效β受体激动剂,ICS/LABA/MON组中这一比例为71.8%(P > 0.05)。ICS/MON组4.4%的患者发生了哮喘发作,ICS/LABA/MON组为6.8%(P > 0.05)。ICS/LABA/MON组在索引期后哮喘发作的调整后优势比相对于ICS/MON组为1.24,95%置信区间为0.35 - 4.44。
在这项针对轻度持续性哮喘和过敏性鼻炎联合药物治疗的观察性研究中,对于一年中的哮喘发作率,LABA/ICS/MON联合治疗与不使用LABA的ICS/MON联合治疗之间未观察到差异。