• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因关系过近而无法直言?群体网络密度与地位冲突如何影响群体建言。

Too Close to Speak Up? How Group Network Density and Status Conflict Affect Group Voice.

作者信息

Ko Yumi, Chung Myung-Ho, Choi Dongwon

机构信息

Ewha School of Business, Ewha Womans University, 52-Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;15(7):926. doi: 10.3390/bs15070926.

DOI:10.3390/bs15070926
PMID:40723710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12292139/
Abstract

Although group network characteristics significantly influence a group's ability to exchange and absorb knowledge by listening to group members' opinions, previous research on voice behavior has not yet fully addressed the social and relational factors in work groups that affect group-level voice. Specifically, in line with the "dark side of social capital" argument, this study examined the effects of group network density on group voice. In addition, drawing on the notion of status conflict, we further examined the moderating role of status conflict on the relationship between group network density and group voice. Using data from 55 work groups, we found an inverted U-shaped relationship between group network density and group voice. Moreover, we found that status conflict moderated the inverted-U effect of group density on group voice, such that when status conflict was high, (1) the overall level of group voice was reduced and (2) group voice decreased faster on the downward side of the inverted-U curve. Herein, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these results with relation to effective group management.

摘要

尽管群体网络特征通过倾听群体成员的意见显著影响群体交流和吸收知识的能力,但以往关于建言行为的研究尚未充分探讨工作群体中影响群体层面建言的社会和关系因素。具体而言,根据“社会资本的阴暗面”这一观点,本研究考察了群体网络密度对群体建言的影响。此外,基于地位冲突的概念,我们进一步考察了地位冲突在群体网络密度与群体建言关系中的调节作用。利用来自55个工作群体的数据,我们发现群体网络密度与群体建言之间存在倒U形关系。此外,我们发现地位冲突调节了群体密度对群体建言的倒U形效应,即当地位冲突较高时,(1)群体建言的总体水平降低,(2)在倒U形曲线的下降侧,群体建言下降得更快。在此,我们讨论这些结果对于有效群体管理的理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1f9/12292139/39f9228dc070/behavsci-15-00926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1f9/12292139/39f9228dc070/behavsci-15-00926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1f9/12292139/39f9228dc070/behavsci-15-00926-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Too Close to Speak Up? How Group Network Density and Status Conflict Affect Group Voice.因关系过近而无法直言?群体网络密度与地位冲突如何影响群体建言。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;15(7):926. doi: 10.3390/bs15070926.
2
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Network analysis of the relationships between voice behavior and team psychological safety climate among Chinese nurses.中国护士群体中语音行为与团队心理安全氛围关系的网络分析
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03388-z.
10
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.

本文引用的文献

1
Centralization of member voice in teams: Its effects on expertise utilization and team performance.团队中成员声音的集中化:对专业知识利用和团队绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Aug;103(8):813-827. doi: 10.1037/apl0000305. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains.信息内容很重要:促进性和禁止性团队发声对团队生产力和安全绩效增益的差异影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Aug;102(8):1259-1270. doi: 10.1037/apl0000215. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
3
The Detection and Interpretation of Interaction Effects Between Continuous Variables in Multiple Regression.
多元回归中连续变量间交互作用的检测与解释。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Oct 1;25(4):467-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2504_4.
4
When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables.何时以及为何中央员工会直言不讳?对中介和调节变量的考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):582-91. doi: 10.1037/a0018315.
5
Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making.隐藏的概况与隐蔽的信息:群体决策中的战略信息共享与运用
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jun;35(6):793-806. doi: 10.1177/0146167209333176. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
6
Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.信息共享与团队绩效:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):535-46. doi: 10.1037/a0013773.
7
Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making.少数派异议与团队创新:参与决策的重要性。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1191-201. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191.
8
Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability.作为情境绩效不同形式的发声与合作行为:与大五人格特质及认知能力的差异关系证据
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Apr;86(2):326-36. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326.