Palizas Fernando, Dubin Arnaldo, Regueira Tomas, Bruhn Alejandro, Knobel Elias, Lazzeri Silvio, Baredes Natalio, Hernández Glenn
Clínica Bazterrica, Unidad de Terapia Intensiva, Billinghurst 2074 (y Juncal) (CP 1425), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R44. doi: 10.1186/cc7767. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
Resuscitation goals for septic shock remain controversial. Despite the normalization of systemic hemodynamic variables, tissue hypoperfusion can still persist. Indeed, lactate or oxygen venous saturation may be difficult to interpret. Our hypothesis was that a gastric intramucosal pH-guided resuscitation protocol might improve the outcome of septic shock compared with a standard approach aimed at normalizing systemic parameters such as cardiac index (CI).
The 130 septic-shock patients were randomized to two different resuscitation goals: CI >or= 3.0 L/min/m2 (CI group: 66 patients) or intramucosal pH (pHi) >or= 7.32 (pHi group: 64 patients). After correcting basic physiologic parameters, additional resuscitation consisting of more fluids and dobutamine was started if specific goals for each group had not been reached. Several clinical data were registered at baseline and during evolution. Hemodynamic data and pHi values were registered every 6 hours during the protocol. Primary end point was 28 days' mortality.
Both groups were comparable at baseline. The most frequent sources of infection were abdominal sepsis and pneumonia. Twenty-eight day mortality (30.3 vs. 28.1%), peak Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System scores (32.6 +/- 6.5 vs. 33.2 +/- 4.7) and ICU length of stay (12.6 +/- 8.2 vs. 16 +/- 12.4 days) were comparable. A higher proportion of patients exhibited values below the specific target at baseline in the pHi group compared with the CI group (50% vs. 10.9%; P < 0.001). Of 32 patients with a pHi < 7.32 at baseline, only 7 (22%) normalized this parameter after resuscitation. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves to predict mortality at baseline, and at 24 and 48 hours were 0.55, 0.61, and 0.47, and 0.70, 0.90, and 0.75, for CI and pHi, respectively.
Our study failed to demonstrate any survival benefit of using pHi compared with CI as resuscitation goal in septic-shock patients. Nevertheless, a normalization of pHi within 24 hours of resuscitation is a strong signal of therapeutic success, and in contrast, a persistent low pHi despite treatment is associated with a very bad prognosis in septic-shock patients.
脓毒性休克的复苏目标仍存在争议。尽管全身血流动力学变量已恢复正常,但组织灌注不足可能仍然存在。实际上,乳酸或氧静脉饱和度可能难以解读。我们的假设是,与旨在使诸如心脏指数(CI)等全身参数正常化的标准方法相比,以胃黏膜内pH值为导向的复苏方案可能会改善脓毒性休克的预后。
130例脓毒性休克患者被随机分为两种不同的复苏目标组:CI≥3.0L/(min·m²)(CI组:66例患者)或黏膜内pH值(pHi)≥7.32(pHi组:64例患者)。在纠正基本生理参数后,如果未达到每组的特定目标,则开始额外的复苏,包括输注更多液体和使用多巴酚丁胺。在基线和病情发展过程中记录了多项临床数据。在方案实施期间,每6小时记录一次血流动力学数据和pHi值。主要终点是28天死亡率。
两组在基线时具有可比性。最常见的感染源是腹部脓毒症和肺炎。28天死亡率(30.3%对28.1%)、治疗干预评分系统峰值评分(32.6±6.5对33.2±4.7)和重症监护病房住院时间(12.6±8.2天对16±12.4天)具有可比性。与CI组相比,pHi组在基线时表现出低于特定目标值的患者比例更高(50%对10.9%;P<0.001)。在基线时pHi<7.32的32例患者中,只有7例(22%)在复苏后该参数恢复正常。CI和pHi预测基线、24小时和48小时死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.55、0.61和0.47,以及0.70、0.90和0.75。
我们的研究未能证明在脓毒性休克患者中,与以CI作为复苏目标相比,使用pHi有任何生存获益。然而,复苏后24小时内pHi恢复正常是治疗成功的有力信号,相反,尽管接受治疗但pHi持续偏低与脓毒性休克患者的预后极差相关。