Gomersall C D, Joynt G M, Freebairn R C, Hung V, Buckley T A, Oh T E
Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Mar;28(3):607-14. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200003000-00001.
To determine whether additional therapy aimed at correcting low gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) improves outcome in conventionally resuscitated, critically ill patients.
Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
General intensive care unit (ICU) of a university teaching hospital.
A total of 210 adult patients, with a median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 24 (range, 8-51).
All patients were resuscitated according to standard guidelines. After resuscitation, those patients in the intervention group with a pHi of <7.35 were treated with additional colloid and then dobutamine (5 microg/kg/min then 10 microg/kg min) until 24 hrs after enrollment.
There were no significant differences (p > .05) in ICU mortality (39.6% in the control group vs. 38.5% in the intervention group), hospital mortality (45.3% in the control group vs. 42.3% in the intervention group), and 30-day mortality (43.7% in the control group vs. 40.2 in the intervention group); survival curves; median modified maximal multiorgan dysfunction score (10 points in the control group vs. 13 points in the intervention group); median modified duration of ICU stay (12 days in the control group vs. 11.5 days in the intervention group); or median modified duration of hospital stay (60 days in the control group vs. 42 days in the intervention group). A subgroup analysis of those patients with gastric mucosal pH of > or =7.35 at admission revealed no difference in ICU mortality (10.3% in the control group vs. 14.8% in the intervention group), hospital mortality (13.8% in the control group vs. 29.6% in the intervention group), or 30-day mortality (10.3% in the control group vs. 26.9% in the intervention group).
The routine use of treatment titrated against pHi in the management of critically ill patients cannot be supported. Failure to improve outcome may be caused by an inability to produce a clinically significant change in pHi or because pHi is simply a marker of disease rather than a factor in the pathogenesis of multiorgan failure.
确定针对纠正低胃黏膜内pH值(pHi)的额外治疗是否能改善经传统复苏的重症患者的预后。
前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
一所大学教学医院的综合重症监护病房(ICU)。
共210例成年患者,急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)中位数为24分(范围8 - 51分)。
所有患者均按照标准指南进行复苏。复苏后,干预组中pHi < 7.35的患者接受额外的胶体液治疗,随后给予多巴酚丁胺(先5微克/千克/分钟,然后10微克/千克/分钟),直至入组后24小时。
在ICU死亡率(对照组为39.6%,干预组为38.5%)、医院死亡率(对照组为45.3%,干预组为42.3%)和30天死亡率(对照组为43.7%,干预组为40.2%)、生存曲线、改良最大多器官功能障碍评分中位数(对照组为10分,干预组为13分)、ICU住院时间中位数(对照组为12天,干预组为11.5天)或医院住院时间中位数(对照组为60天,干预组为42天)方面,均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。对入院时胃黏膜pH值≥7.35的患者进行亚组分析显示,在ICU死亡率(对照组为10.3%,干预组为14.8%)、医院死亡率(对照组为13.8%,干预组为29.6%)或30天死亡率(对照组为10.3%,干预组为26.9%)方面也无差异。
在重症患者管理中常规使用根据pHi调整的治疗方法缺乏依据。未能改善预后可能是由于无法使pHi产生具有临床意义的变化,或者是因为pHi仅仅是疾病的一个标志物,而非多器官功能衰竭发病机制中的一个因素。