Budnar Vijaya M, Amirfeyz Rouin, Ng Michael, Bannister Gordon C, Blom Ashley W
Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Apr;91(3):224-5. doi: 10.1308/003588409X391721.
Pulsed lavage during a total knee replacement usually leaves a pool of fluid on the surgical drapes. It is common practice to suck away this fluid using the same suction device used intra-operatively. This could be a cause of direct wound contamination. We hypothesised that bacteria contaminate fluid that collects around the foot in total knee replacement surgery and that suction equipment could be a portal of contamination. We also hypothesised that bacterial count in the fluid is lower if chlorhexidine, rather than saline, is used in the pulsed lavage.
Forty patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were divided into two groups. The first group had pulsed lavage with normal saline and the second with 0.05% chlorhexidine.
At the end of the operation, 20 ml of fluid, pooled on the surgical drapes was aspirated and cultured for bacterial growth. None of the fluid samples showed bacterial growth.
Suction device used peri-operatively during knee replacement is unlikely to be a cause of wound contamination. Pulsed lavage with normal saline is as effective as lavage with chlorhexidine.
全膝关节置换术中的脉冲冲洗通常会在手术单上留下一滩液体。术中使用同一吸引装置吸走这些液体是常见做法。这可能是直接伤口污染的一个原因。我们推测在全膝关节置换手术中,细菌会污染积聚在足部周围的液体,并且吸引设备可能是污染途径。我们还推测,如果在脉冲冲洗中使用氯己定而非生理盐水,液体中的细菌计数会更低。
40例行初次全膝关节置换的患者被分为两组。第一组用生理盐水进行脉冲冲洗,第二组用0.05%氯己定进行冲洗。
手术结束时,抽取手术单上积聚的20毫升液体进行细菌生长培养。所有液体样本均未显示细菌生长。
膝关节置换术中围手术期使用的吸引装置不太可能是伤口污染的原因。用生理盐水进行脉冲冲洗与用氯己定冲洗同样有效。