K. Schmidt OrthoArizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA C. Estes Portland Adventist Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA A. McLaren University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Phoenix Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Phoenix, AZ, USA M. J. Spangehl Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Mar;476(3):648-653. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000052.
Antiseptic and antibacterial solutions used for intraoperative irrigation are intended to kill bacteria and thereby decrease the incidence of surgical site infections. It is unknown if the concentrations and exposure times of irrigation solutions commonly used for prophylaxis in clean cases (povidone-iodine 0.35% for 3 minutes) are effective against bacteria in biofilm that are present in implant infections. Currently, povidone-iodine (0.35%), chlorhexidine (0.05%), sodium hypochlorite (0.125%), and triple antibacterial solution are all being used off-label for wound irrigation after surgical débridement for orthopaedic infections.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Do commonly used antibacterials and antiseptics kill bacteria in established biofilm at clinically relevant concentrations and exposure times?
Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC#35984) biofilms were exposed to chlorhexidine (0.025%, 0.05%, and 0.1%), povidone-iodine (0.35%, 1.0%, 3.5%, and 10%), sodium hypochlorite (0.125%, 0.25%, and 0.5%,), and triple antibacterial solution (bacitracin 50,000 U/L, gentamicin 80 mg/L, and polymyxin 500,000 U/L) for 1, 5, and 10 minutes in triplicate. Surviving bacteria were detected by 21-day subculture. Failure to eradicate all bacteria in any of the three replicates was considered to be "not effective" for that respective solution, concentration, and exposure time.
Chlorhexidine 0.05% and 0.1% at all three exposure times, povidone-iodine 10% at all three exposure times, and povidone-iodine 3.5% at 10 minutes only were effective at eradicating S epidermidis from biofilm. All concentrations and all exposure times of sodium hypochlorite and triple antibacterial solution were not effective.
Chlorhexidine is capable of eradicating S epidermidis from biofilm in vitro in clinically relevant concentrations and exposure times. Povidone-iodine at commonly used concentrations and exposure times, sodium hypochlorite, and triple antibacterial solutions are not.
This in vitro study suggests that chlorhexidine may be a more effective irrigation solution for S epidermidis in biofilm than other commonly used solutions, such as povidone-iodine, Dakin's solution, and triple antibiotic solution. Clinical outcomes should be studied to determine the most effective antiseptic agent, concentration, and exposure time when intraoperative irrigation is used in the presence of biofilm.
术中冲洗用的抗菌和消毒溶液旨在杀死细菌,从而降低手术部位感染的发生率。目前尚不清楚在清洁病例中预防性使用的冲洗溶液(聚维酮碘 0.35% 冲洗 3 分钟)的浓度和暴露时间是否对植入物感染中存在的生物膜内的细菌有效。目前,聚维酮碘(0.35%)、洗必泰(0.05%)、次氯酸钠(0.125%)和三抗溶液均在骨科感染手术后清创后用于伤口冲洗,属于超说明书用药。
问题/目的:常用的抗菌和消毒剂是否能在临床相关的浓度和暴露时间内杀死已建立的生物膜中的细菌?
表皮葡萄球菌(ATCC#35984)生物膜分别用洗必泰(0.025%、0.05%和 0.1%)、聚维酮碘(0.35%、1.0%、3.5%和 10%)、次氯酸钠(0.125%、0.25%和 0.5%)和三抗溶液(杆菌肽 50000 U/L、庆大霉素 80 mg/L 和多粘菌素 500000 U/L)处理 1、5 和 10 分钟,一式三份。通过 21 天的亚培养检测存活的细菌。如果在三次重复实验中的任何一次实验中都未能消灭所有细菌,则认为该溶液在相应的浓度和暴露时间下“无效”。
在所有三种暴露时间下,浓度为 0.05%和 0.1%的洗必泰、所有三种暴露时间下的聚维酮碘 10%和仅在 10 分钟时的聚维酮碘 3.5%能够有效消除生物膜中的表皮葡萄球菌。所有浓度和所有暴露时间的次氯酸钠和三抗溶液均无效。
在临床相关的浓度和暴露时间下,洗必泰能够从生物膜中消除表皮葡萄球菌。而常用浓度和暴露时间的聚维酮碘、次氯酸钠和三抗溶液则不能。
这项体外研究表明,与其他常用溶液(如聚维酮碘、达金溶液和三抗生素溶液)相比,洗必泰可能是生物膜中表皮葡萄球菌更有效的冲洗溶液。应进行临床研究以确定在存在生物膜时术中冲洗使用的最佳消毒剂、浓度和暴露时间。