Mancuso Daniela Nardi, Goiato Marcelo Coelho, Dekon Stefan Fiuza de Carvalho, Gennari-Filho Humberto
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, UNESP-Sao Paulo State University, Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;20(1):77-80. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.49073.
The objective of this study was to evaluate by a visual method of comparison the color stability of nonpigmented and pigmented facial silicones after accelerated aging.
Two kinds of silicones were used in this study; one specifically formulated for facial prostheses and the other an acetic silicone for industrial use. Twenty-four trial bodies were made for each silicone. These were divided into colorless and intrinsically pigmented groups: ceramic, make-up, and iron oxide. The groups were submitted to accelerated aging for nonmetallic materials. An initial reading and subsequent readings were made at 163, 351, 692, and 1000 hours using a visual method of comparison. The values were annotated in a spreadsheet by two observers, according to scores elaborated for this study.
All groups presented color stability in the visual method. According to the results obtained and analyzed in this study, we can conclude that both silicones, Silastic 732 RTV and Silastic MDX 4-4210, behaved similarly, they can therefore be indicated for use in maxillofacial prosthesis. The time factor of aging influenced negatively, independently of the pigmentation, or lack of it, and of silicones and no group had visually noticeable alterations in any of the accelerated aging time, independently of the addition or not of pigments.
本研究的目的是通过视觉比较方法评估非色素沉着和色素沉着面部硅酮在加速老化后的颜色稳定性。
本研究使用了两种硅酮;一种是专门为面部假体配制的,另一种是工业用的醋酸硅酮。每种硅酮制作了24个试件。这些试件分为无色组和固有色素沉着组:陶瓷色、化妆色和氧化铁色。这些组接受了针对非金属材料的加速老化处理。使用视觉比较方法在163、351、692和1000小时进行初始读数和后续读数。两名观察者根据为本研究制定的评分标准将这些值记录在电子表格中。
在视觉比较方法中,所有组均呈现出颜色稳定性。根据本研究获得并分析的结果,我们可以得出结论,两种硅酮,即Silastic 732 RTV和Silastic MDX 4 - 4210,表现相似,因此可用于颌面假体。老化的时间因素产生了负面影响,与色素沉着与否以及硅酮种类无关,并且在任何加速老化时间内,没有一组在视觉上有明显变化,无论是否添加了色素。