Hol L, Wilschut J A, van Ballegooijen M, van Vuuren A J, van der Valk H, Reijerink J C I Y, van der Togt A C M, Kuipers E J, Habbema J D F, van Leerdam M E
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer. 2009 Apr 7;100(7):1103-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604961.
Immunochemical faecal occult blood testing (FIT) provides quantitative test results, which allows optimisation of the cut-off value for follow-up colonoscopy. We conducted a randomised population-based trial to determine test characteristics of FIT (OC-Sensor micro, Eiken, Japan) screening at different cut-off levels and compare these with guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) screening in an average risk population. A representative sample of the Dutch population (n=10 011), aged 50-74 years, was 1 : 1 randomised before invitation to gFOBT and FIT screening. Colonoscopy was offered to screenees with a positive gFOBT or FIT (cut-off 50 ng haemoglobin/ml). When varying the cut-off level between 50 and 200 ng ml(-1), the positivity rate of FIT ranged between 8.1% (95% CI: 7.2-9.1%) and 3.5% (95% CI: 2.9-4.2%), the detection rate of advanced neoplasia ranged between 3.2% (95% CI: 2.6-3.9%) and 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6-2.6%), and the specificity ranged between 95.5% (95% CI: 94.5-96.3%) and 98.8% (95% CI: 98.4-99.0%). At a cut-off value of 75 ng ml(-1), the detection rate was two times higher than with gFOBT screening (gFOBT: 1.2%; FIT: 2.5%; P<0.001), whereas the number needed to scope (NNscope) to find one screenee with advanced neoplasia was similar (2.2 vs 1.9; P=0.69). Immunochemical faecal occult blood testing is considerably more effective than gFOBT screening within the range of tested cut-off values. From our experience, a cut-off value of 75 ng ml(-1) provided an adequate positivity rate and an acceptable trade-off between detection rate and NNscope.
免疫化学粪便潜血检测(FIT)可提供定量检测结果,这有助于优化后续结肠镜检查的临界值。我们开展了一项基于人群的随机试验,以确定不同临界值水平下FIT(OC-Sensor micro,日本荣研)筛查的检测特征,并将其与平均风险人群中基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血检测(gFOBT)筛查进行比较。在邀请进行gFOBT和FIT筛查之前,将10011名年龄在50 - 74岁的荷兰人群代表性样本按1:1随机分组。对gFOBT或FIT呈阳性(临界值为50 ng血红蛋白/毫升)的受检者提供结肠镜检查。当临界值在50至200 ng/ml之间变化时,FIT的阳性率在8.1%(95%CI:7.2 - 9.1%)至3.5%(95%CI:2.9 - 4.2%)之间,晚期肿瘤的检出率在3.2%(95%CI:2.6 - 3.9%)至2.1%(95%CI:1.6 - 2.6%)之间,特异性在95.5%(95%CI:94.5 - 96.3%)至98.8%(95%CI:98.4 - 99.0%)之间。在临界值为75 ng/ml时,检出率比gFOBT筛查高两倍(gFOBT:1.2%;FIT:2.5%;P<0.001),而发现一名晚期肿瘤受检者所需的结肠镜检查人数(NNscope)相似(2.2对1.9;P = 0.69)。在测试的临界值范围内,免疫化学粪便潜血检测比gFOBT筛查有效得多。根据我们的经验,75 ng/ml的临界值提供了足够的阳性率,并在检出率和NNscope之间实现了可接受的权衡。