Skarja Metod, Jerman Igor, Ruzic Romana, Leskovar Robert T, Jejcic Luka
BION, Institute for Bioelectromagnetics and New Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Electromagn Biol Med. 2009;28(1):85-95. doi: 10.1080/15368370802711854.
Measurements of the response of organisms to the near field exposure show that this response, i.e., its absorption, transmission, and emission (ATE) of the organism, markedly differs from the behavior expected if one treats the organism as a simple dissipative conductive body. The results point to the at least partial active response of the organism. This active electrical response can be attributed at least partially to the response of the endogenous electromagnetic field of organisms, first postulated by Frohlich, and to the material structures that form an inseparable whole with this field. The near electric field influence, both on the organism and of the organism on the sensors, can be established either through the vicinity or through a direct nonconductive contact. This response correlates with the physiological state of an organism. Measurements performed with mealworm beetles indicated that the normal living organisms absorb and use some energy of the near electric field and therefore the transmitted (re-emitted) signal is weaker. The inactivated or the dead organisms are more passive electrical absorbers.
对生物体对近场暴露的响应进行测量表明，这种响应，即生物体的吸收、传输和发射（ATE），与将生物体视为简单耗散导体时预期的行为明显不同。结果表明生物体至少有部分主动响应。这种主动电响应至少部分可归因于弗罗利希首次提出的生物体内源电磁场的响应，以及与该场形成不可分割整体的物质结构。近电场对生物体以及生物体对传感器的影响，可以通过近距离或直接非导电接触来实现。这种响应与生物体的生理状态相关。用黄粉虫进行的测量表明，正常的活生物体吸收并利用近电场的一些能量，因此传输（重新发射）的信号较弱。失活或死亡的生物体是更被动的电吸收体。
