Federsel Hans-Jürgen
Global Process R&D, AstraZeneca, 151 85 Södertälje, Sweden.
Acc Chem Res. 2009 May 19;42(5):671-80. doi: 10.1021/ar800257v.
In process research and development (PR&D), the generation and manipulation of small-molecule drugs ranges from bench-scale (laboratory) chemistry to pilot plant manufacture to commercial production. A broad range of disciplines, including process chemistry (organic synthesis), analytical chemistry, process engineering (mass and heat transfer, unit operations), process safety (chemical risk assessment), regulatory compliance, and plant operation, must be effectively applied. In the critical handover between medicinal chemistry and PR&D, compound production is typically scaled up from a few hundred grams to several kilograms. Can the methodologies applied to the former also satisfy the technical, safety, and scalability aspects that come into play in the latter? Occasionally, the transition might occur smoothly, but more often the situation is the opposite: much work and resources must be invested to design a process that is feasible for manufacturing on pilot scale and, eventually, for commercial production. Authentic examples provide enlightening illustrations of dos and don'ts for developing syntheses designed for round-flask operation into production-scale processes. Factors that are easily underestimated or even neglected in the laboratory, such as method robustness, chemical hazards, safety concerns, environmental impact, availability of starting materials and building blocks in bulk quantities, intellectual property (IP) issues, and the final cost of the product, will come into play and need to be addressed appropriately. The decision on which route will be the best for further development is a crucial event and should come into focus early on the R&D timeline. In addition to scientific and technical concerns, the parameter of speed has come to the forefront in the pharmaceutical arena. Although historically the drug industry has tolerated a total time investment of far more than 10 years from idea to market, the current worldwide paradigm requires a reduction to under 10 years for the specific segment covering preclinical development through launch. This change puts enormous pressure on the entire organization, and the implication for PR&D is that the time allowed for conducting route design and scale-up has shrunk accordingly. Furthermore, molecular complexity has become extremely challenging in many instances, and demand steadily grows for process understanding and knowledge generation about low-level byproduct, which often must be controlled even at trace concentrations to meet regulatory specifications (especially in the case of potentially genotoxic impurities). In this Account, we paint a broad picture of the technical challenges the PR&D community is grappling with today, focusing on what measures have been taken over the years to create more efficiency and effectiveness.
在工艺研发(PR&D)中,小分子药物的生成与处理涵盖了从实验室规模(实验室)化学到中试工厂制造再到商业化生产的过程。必须有效应用广泛的学科知识,包括工艺化学(有机合成)、分析化学、工艺工程(质量和热传递、单元操作)、工艺安全(化学风险评估)、法规合规以及工厂运营等。在药物化学与工艺研发的关键交接阶段,化合物的产量通常会从几百克扩大到几千克。应用于前者的方法能否也满足后者所涉及的技术、安全和可扩展性方面的要求呢?偶尔,这种过渡可能会顺利进行,但更多时候情况恰恰相反:必须投入大量的工作和资源来设计一个在中试规模上可行、最终可用于商业化生产的工艺。真实案例为将适用于圆底烧瓶操作的合成方法开发成生产规模工艺的注意事项提供了具有启发性的例证。在实验室中容易被低估甚至忽视的因素,如方法稳健性、化学危害、安全问题、环境影响、大量起始原料和构件的可用性、知识产权(IP)问题以及产品的最终成本等,都将发挥作用并需要得到妥善解决。决定哪条路线最适合进一步开发是一个关键事件,应在研发时间表的早期就予以关注。除了科学和技术方面的考虑,速度参数在制药领域也变得至关重要。尽管从历史上看,制药行业容忍从想法到上市的总时间投入远远超过10年,但当前全球的模式要求将涵盖临床前开发到上市的特定阶段的时间缩短至10年以下。这种变化给整个组织带来了巨大压力,对工艺研发的影响是进行路线设计和放大的时间相应缩短。此外,分子复杂性在许多情况下已变得极具挑战性,并且对工艺理解以及关于低水平副产物的知识生成的需求稳步增长,这些副产物通常即使在痕量浓度下也必须加以控制以满足法规要求(特别是在潜在基因毒性杂质的情况下)。在本综述中,我们描绘了工艺研发界目前正在应对的广泛技术挑战,重点关注多年来为提高效率和有效性所采取的措施。