Abdou Asmaa Gaber, Abd El-Wahed Moshira Mohammed, Asaad Nancy Youssef, Samaka Rehab Monir, Abdallaha Rania
Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menofiya University, Shebein Elkom, Egypt.
APMIS. 2009 Apr;117(4):277-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2009.02448.x.
Ephrin receptors and ephrin ligands constitute one of the largest groups of tyrosine kinases. The division of ephrin receptors into type A or type B is determined by their ligand-binding specificities. Ephrin A4 as a ligand has a broad capacity to bind and stimulate different subtypes of ephrin A receptors. Little is known about the role of ephrins generally and ephrin A4 particularly in osteosarcoma. Ephrin A4 was immunohistochemically assessed on archival material from 46 primary osteosarcoma cases, 10 metastatic pulmonary lesions and 20 normal control bone specimens. Ephrin A4 was expressed in 100% of normal bone specimens, in 84.4% of primary osteosarcoma cases and in all metastatic pulmonary lesions. Cytoplasmic and nucleocytoplasmic patterns of ephrin A4 immunoreactivity were observed, with the predominance of the latter pattern in normal bone (100%), and in 43.5% of primary osteosarcoma cases, which showed a higher intensity of expression compared with normal bone (p<0.05). The cytoplasmic pattern is the only staining pattern seen in metastatic cases, which may suggest its role in enhancement of invasion and metastasis. The differences in the distribution of the two patterns of ephrin A4 may indicate a different biological activity of this molecule depending on its localization. The nuclear localization of ephrin A4 requires further investigation to clarify the mechanism and the significance of the nuclear trafficking of ephrin A4.
Ephrin受体和Ephrin配体构成了最大的酪氨酸激酶家族之一。Ephrin受体分为A型或B型是由它们的配体结合特异性决定的。Ephrin A4作为一种配体,具有广泛的结合和刺激不同亚型Ephrin A受体的能力。关于Ephrins,特别是Ephrin A4在骨肉瘤中的作用,人们了解甚少。对46例原发性骨肉瘤病例、10例转移性肺病变和20例正常对照骨标本的存档材料进行了Ephrin A4的免疫组织化学评估。Ephrin A4在100%的正常骨标本、84.4%的原发性骨肉瘤病例和所有转移性肺病变中均有表达。观察到Ephrin A4免疫反应性的细胞质和核质模式,在正常骨(100%)和43.5%的原发性骨肉瘤病例中,后者模式占优势,与正常骨相比,其表达强度更高(p<0.05)。细胞质模式是转移性病例中唯一可见的染色模式,这可能表明其在增强侵袭和转移中的作用。Ephrin A4两种模式分布的差异可能表明该分子根据其定位具有不同的生物学活性。Ephrin A4的核定位需要进一步研究以阐明Ephrin A4核转运的机制和意义。