Prinjha Suman, Field Kate, Rowan Kathy
DIPEx Research Group, Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.
Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R46. doi: 10.1186/cc7769. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
UK policy recommendations advocate the use of intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up services to help detect and treat patients' physical and emotional problems after hospital discharge and as a means of service evaluation. This study explores patients' perceptions and experiences of these services.
Thirty-four former ICU patients were recruited throughout the UK, using maximum variation sampling to achieve as broad a range of experiences of the ICU as possible. Participants were interviewed at home by a qualitative researcher unconnected to their hospital care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for analysis. We report a qualitative thematic analysis of patients' experiences of ICU follow up.
Former patients said they valued ICU follow-up services, which had made an important contribution to their physical, emotional and psychological recovery in terms of continuity of care, receiving information, gaining expert reassurance and giving feedback to ICU staff. Continuity of care included having tests and being monitored, referrals to other specialists and ICU follow-up appointments soon after hospital discharge. Information about physical, emotional and psychological recovery was particularly important to patients, as was information that helped them make sense of their ICU experience. Those without access to ICU follow-up care often felt abandoned or disappointed because they had no opportunity to be monitored, referred or get more information.
Former patients value having ICU follow-up services but many found that their healthcare needs were unmet because hospitals were unable to provide the aftercare they required. Most participants were aware of the financial constraints on the health system. Although they valued ICU follow-up care, they did not want it to continue indefinitely, with many of them declining appointment invitations when they themselves felt they no longer needed them.
英国的政策建议提倡使用重症监护病房(ICU)随访服务,以帮助发现并治疗患者出院后的身体和情绪问题,并作为服务评估的一种方式。本研究探讨了患者对这些服务的看法和体验。
在英国各地招募了34名曾入住ICU的患者,采用最大差异抽样法,以尽可能广泛地获取ICU的各种体验。由一名与患者住院治疗无关的定性研究人员在家中对参与者进行访谈。访谈进行录音并转录以供分析。我们报告了对患者ICU随访体验的定性主题分析。
曾入住ICU的患者表示,他们重视ICU随访服务,该服务在护理连续性、获取信息、获得专家安心以及向ICU工作人员反馈方面,对他们的身体、情绪和心理恢复做出了重要贡献。护理连续性包括进行检查和监测、转诊至其他专科医生以及出院后不久的ICU随访预约。有关身体、情绪和心理恢复的信息对患者尤为重要,有助于他们理解自己ICU经历的信息同样重要。那些无法获得ICU随访护理的患者常常感到被遗弃或失望,因为他们没有机会接受监测、转诊或获取更多信息。
曾入住ICU的患者重视ICU随访服务,但许多人发现他们的医疗需求未得到满足,因为医院无法提供他们所需的后续护理。大多数参与者意识到卫生系统面临的资金限制。尽管他们重视ICU随访护理,但并不希望其无限期持续,许多人在自己觉得不再需要时会拒绝预约邀请。