Suppr超能文献

多学科过渡性护理干预措施成功实施的促进因素、障碍及指导:一项使用实施研究综合框架的定性系统评价

Facilitators, barriers, and guidance to successful implementation of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions: A qualitative systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

作者信息

Collet Romain, van Grootel Juul, van der Leeden Marike, van der Schaaf Marike, van Dongen Johanna, Wiertsema Suzanne, Geleijn Edwin, Major Mel, Ostelo Raymond

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Nov 29;8:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100269. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions aim to improve the coordination and continuity of healthcare during hospitalization and after discharge for patients with complex care needs related to physical, nutritional, or psychosocial status. Implementing such interventions is complex as they involve many stakeholders across multiple settings. Numerous studies have evaluated patients', family members', and healthcare professionals' experiences with multidisciplinary transitional care interventions, which can provide insight into facilitators and barriers to their implementation.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of facilitators and barriers to implementing multidisciplinary transitional care interventions, which could be considered before developing implementation strategies.

DESIGN

A qualitative systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

SETTINGS

Hospitals and primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients admitted to a hospital, regardless of their diagnosis, as well as their family members and hospital and primary care healthcare professionals.

METHODS

Embase, CINAHL, and Medline were searched for qualitative studies evaluating multidisciplinary transitional care interventions through patients', family members', and healthcare professionals' experiences and views from inception until June 2024. The methodological rigor was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. We identified facilitators and barriers to the successful implementation of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Facilitators and barriers were categorized into pre- or post-discharge or general factors.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included and appraised. We identified 79 factors, mostly linked to three domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Innovation, Inner setting, and Individuals involved. Facilitators included "comprehensive follow-up care needs assessment"(pre-discharge), "immediate, tailored follow-up care"(post-discharge), and "improved communication between stakeholders"(general). Barriers included "shortage of hospital beds" and "lack of time"(pre-discharge), "lack of available primary care professionals"(post-discharge), "inconsistencies of stakeholders' schedules" and "intervention costs"(general).

CONCLUSIONS

The factors identified could serve as a non-exhaustive inventory list to inspire readers who wish to implement a multidisciplinary transitional care intervention in their settings. Digital tools and alternative financing models might overcome cost and reimbursement issues, the increasing complexity of patient care, and shortcomings, such as the lack of available hospital beds or professionals. Further research should identify effective implementation strategies, considering the pre-, post-discharge, and general factors identified.

REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023421423).

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Effective communication aids in implementing transitional care interventions, but patient care complexity and healthcare system pressures present challenges.

摘要

背景

多学科过渡性护理干预旨在改善住院期间以及出院后针对因身体、营养或心理社会状况而有复杂护理需求的患者的医疗保健协调与连续性。实施此类干预措施很复杂,因为它们涉及多个环境中的众多利益相关者。许多研究评估了患者、家庭成员和医疗保健专业人员在多学科过渡性护理干预方面的经历,这有助于深入了解其实施的促进因素和障碍。

目的

概述实施多学科过渡性护理干预的促进因素和障碍,以便在制定实施策略之前加以考虑。

设计

采用实施研究综合框架进行定性系统评价。

环境

医院和初级保健机构。

参与者

入住医院的成年患者,无论其诊断如何,以及他们的家庭成员、医院和初级保健医疗保健专业人员。

方法

检索Embase、CINAHL和Medline数据库,查找从起始至2024年6月通过患者、家庭成员和医疗保健专业人员的经历及观点评估多学科过渡性护理干预的定性研究。采用批判性评估技能计划评估方法的严谨性。我们利用实施研究综合框架确定多学科过渡性护理干预成功实施的促进因素和障碍。促进因素和障碍被分为出院前、出院后或一般因素。

结果

纳入并评估了12项研究。我们确定了79个因素,大多与实施研究综合框架的三个领域相关:创新、内部环境和相关个人。促进因素包括“全面的随访护理需求评估”(出院前)、“即时、量身定制的随访护理”(出院后)以及“利益相关者之间改善沟通”(一般)。障碍包括“医院床位短缺”和“时间不足 ”(出院前)、“缺乏可用的初级保健专业人员”(出院后)、“利益相关者日程安排不一致”和“干预成本”(一般)。

结论

确定的这些因素可作为一份非详尽的清单,以启发希望在其环境中实施多学科过渡性护理干预的读者。数字工具和替代融资模式可能克服成本和报销问题、患者护理日益增加的复杂性以及诸如缺乏可用医院床位或专业人员等不足。应考虑已确定的出院前、出院后和一般因素,进一步研究确定有效的实施策略。

注册

该方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42023421423)注册。

可发推文摘要

有效的沟通有助于实施过渡性护理干预,但患者护理的复杂性和医疗系统压力带来了挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf22/11647461/efec8f7e797e/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验