Suppr超能文献

患者忽视时对不再存在目标的位置进行重复探索。

Repetitive exploration towards locations that no longer carry a target in patients with neglect.

机构信息

Laboratory for Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

J Neuropsychol. 2010 Mar;4(Pt 1):33-45. doi: 10.1348/174866408X402424. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

Abstract

About 50% of neglect patients show ipsilesional target re-exploration on neglect tasks and in daily life. The present study examines whether omissions and revisitings are due to disengagement failure from visible stimuli on the ipsilesional side. Thirteen patients with neglect and nine healthy controls were tested with three versions of the Bells test on touch screen, i.e. a standard cancellation in which targets have to be marked, an erase cancellation in which targets have to be erased, and a condition in which all items (including distracters) have to be erased. Whereas omissions decreased in the full-erase condition, revisitings were the most prominent in this condition. Our study shows that neglect patients also return to previously visited locations which no longer carry a target.

摘要

约 50%的忽视症患者在忽视任务和日常生活中会出现对侧目标的重新探索。本研究考察了遗漏和重访是否是由于对侧可见刺激的脱离失败所致。13 名忽视症患者和 9 名健康对照者在触摸屏上接受了三种版本的铃声测试,即标准取消,其中目标必须标记;擦除取消,其中目标必须擦除;以及所有项目(包括干扰项)都必须擦除的条件。虽然在完全擦除条件下遗漏减少,但重访在这种条件下最为突出。我们的研究表明,忽视症患者也会返回之前访问过的位置,而这些位置不再有目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验