• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用关键时间干预措施促进精神科住院患者出院后的连续性护理。

Use of a critical time intervention to promote continuity of care after psychiatric inpatient hospitalization.

作者信息

Dixon Lisa, Goldberg Richard, Iannone Virginia, Lucksted Alicia, Brown Clayton, Kreyenbuhl Julie, Fang Lijuan, Potts Wendy

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):451-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.451.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.451
PMID:19339319
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the effectiveness of a brief three-month critical time intervention (B-CTI) model in improving continuity of psychiatric outpatient care for individuals with serious mental illness who are discharged from inpatient psychiatric treatment facilities.

METHODS

A total of 135 consenting veterans who were diagnosed as having serious mental illness and were discharged from an acute inpatient unit were randomly assigned to receive either B-CTI or usual care. The three-month B-CTI intervention begins before discharge. A B-CTI clinician meets with the patient, assesses needs, and maintains a high level of patient contact after discharge. Participants completed interviews at baseline and three months later. Chart reviews provided data on service utilization in the six months postdischarge.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the B-CTI group had significantly fewer days between their hospital discharge and their first outpatient service. B-CTI participants were more likely to have had an outpatient visit and to have had more total mental health and substance abuse visits within 30 and 180 days of discharge. They had greater continuity of care as evidenced by a greater number of two-month blocks with two or more outpatient visits over 180 days. Participants in the B-CTI group reported receiving more help in making and keeping medical and mental health appointments, making family contact and community connections, and receiving information on prescribed medications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that a B-CTI targeted at the point of inpatient discharge can be helpful in promoting postdischarge continuity of care for persons with serious mental illness. The limited association of improved continuity of care with patient outcomes in this brief intervention demands further study.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了一种为期三个月的简短关键时间干预(B-CTI)模式在改善从住院精神科治疗机构出院的严重精神疾病患者的精神科门诊护理连续性方面的有效性。

方法

共有135名被诊断患有严重精神疾病且从急性住院病房出院的退伍军人同意参与研究,他们被随机分配接受B-CTI或常规护理。为期三个月的B-CTI干预在出院前开始。一名B-CTI临床医生与患者会面,评估需求,并在出院后与患者保持高度联系。参与者在基线时和三个月后完成访谈。病历审查提供了出院后六个月内服务利用的数据。

结果

与对照组相比,B-CTI组从出院到首次门诊服务的间隔天数明显更少。B-CTI参与者在出院后30天和180天内更有可能进行门诊就诊,并且总的精神健康和药物滥用就诊次数更多。在180天内有更多两个月时间段内有两次或更多次门诊就诊,这证明他们的护理连续性更强。B-CTI组的参与者报告在安排和遵守医疗及精神健康预约、与家人联系和建立社区联系以及获取处方药信息方面得到了更多帮助。

结论

本研究提供了证据表明,针对住院出院时的B-CTI有助于促进严重精神疾病患者出院后的护理连续性。在这种简短干预中,护理连续性改善与患者结局之间的有限关联需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Use of a critical time intervention to promote continuity of care after psychiatric inpatient hospitalization.使用关键时间干预措施促进精神科住院患者出院后的连续性护理。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):451-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.451.
2
The role of a critical time intervention on the experience of continuity of care among persons with severe mental illness after hospital discharge.关键时期干预对重度精神疾病患者出院后护理连续性体验的作用。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Jan;203(1):65-70. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000224.
3
Outcomes of critical time intervention case management of homeless veterans after psychiatric hospitalization.精神病住院后无家可归退伍军人关键时间干预病例管理的结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jul;58(7):929-35. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.7.929.
4
Mediation analysis of critical time intervention for persons living with serious mental illnesses: assessing the role of family relations in reducing psychiatric rehospitalization.严重精神疾病患者关键时间干预的中介分析:评估家庭关系在减少精神病再住院中的作用。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Mar;37(1):4-10. doi: 10.1037/prj0000015. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
6
Randomized trial of critical time intervention to prevent homelessness after hospital discharge.随机临床试验:关键时间干预以防止出院后无家可归。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Jul;62(7):713-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.7.pss6207_0713.
7
Influence of a transitional care clinic on subsequent 30-day hospitalizations and emergency department visits in individuals discharged from a skilled nursing facility.从护理院出院的患者接受过渡护理诊所治疗对随后 30 天内的住院和急诊就诊的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan;61(1):137-42. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12051. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
8
Can medication management coordinators help improve continuity of care after psychiatric hospitalization?药物管理协调员能否帮助改善精神科住院后的护理连续性?
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jun;63(6):554-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100264.
9
[Engaging patients with serious mental illness in care services by Critical Time Intervention].通过关键时期干预让患有严重精神疾病的患者参与护理服务
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A1791.
10
Post-discharge contact with mental health clinics and psychiatric readmission: a 6-month follow-up study.出院后与心理健康诊所的联系及精神科再入院情况:一项为期6个月的随访研究。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2011;48(4):262-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing a hospital-based case management intervention for people experiencing homelessness: the navigator program.为无家可归者实施基于医院的病例管理干预措施:导航员项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13170-1.
2
Study protocol for a feasibility evaluation of Charge Up!: an adaptation of Critical Time Intervention for young adults moving from homelessness to housing.“充电计划”可行性评估的研究方案:对从无家可归过渡到有住房的年轻人的关键时间干预的一种改编
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 2;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01677-7.
3
Pilot study results from the assertive community treatment transitional intervention program in Switzerland.
瑞士积极社区治疗过渡干预项目的初步研究结果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):8945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93470-y.
4
Strategies for relapse prevention among people with schizophrenia in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa: Healthcare providers' perspectives.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省精神分裂症患者预防复发的策略:医疗服务提供者的观点。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0316313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316313. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluating Intensity, Complexity, and Potential for Causal Inference in Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.评估社会需求干预措施的强度、复杂性和因果推断的可能性:对一项范围综述的综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417994. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17994.
6
Comparing two implementation strategies for implementing and sustaining a case management practice serving homeless-experienced veterans: a protocol for a type 3 hybrid cluster-randomized trial.比较两种实施策略,以实施和维持一项为有流浪经历的退伍军人提供服务的个案管理实践:一项 3 型混合集群随机试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 3;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01236-1.
7
Pathway Home™ for High Utilizers of Psychiatric Inpatient Services: Impact on Inpatient Days and Outpatient Engagement.精神科住院服务高使用者的出院途径:对住院天数和门诊参与度的影响。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Apr;58(3):415-419. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00902-w. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
8
Implementation of a pilot community-based psychosocial intervention for patients with psychoses in Chile and Brazil: a comparative analysis of users' perspectives.在智利和巴西为精神病患者实施基于社区的心理社会干预试点:用户视角的比较分析
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2021 Apr 27;8:e15. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2021.10. eCollection 2021.
9
Unmet Opportunity: Intensive Care Transition Intervention for Individuals With Serious Medical-Psychiatric Illnesses.未满足的机遇:针对患有严重医学-精神疾病个体的重症监护过渡干预。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jul 1;72(7):856-858. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000286. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
10
Factors Associated With Discharge Planning Practices for Patients Receiving Inpatient Psychiatric Care.与接受住院精神科护理的患者出院计划实践相关的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 May 1;72(5):498-506. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.