Kasprow Wesley J, Rosenheck Robert A
Northeast Program Evaluation Center 182, Department of Veterans Affairs, Connecticut Health Care System, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jul;58(7):929-35. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.7.929.
This study evaluated a modification of the critical time intervention (CTI) community case management model for homeless veterans with mental illness who were leaving Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) inpatient care. CTI offers time-limited intensive case management designed to negotiate transitions from institutional settings to community living.
CTI was implemented at eight VA medical centers through a training program that used primarily teleconference-based case review. A comparison cohort (phase 1) of 278 participants was recruited before CTI was implemented, and a treatment cohort (phase 2) of 206 participants was recruited after implementation and offered CTI. Mixed-regression models were used to compare outcomes in phase 1 and phase 2 and controlled for baseline differences between participants in the two phases.
Measures of client service delivery show that CTI was successfully implemented at most sites. Phase 1 veterans had a better work history and more drug use at baseline than phase 2 clients had. Controlling for these differences, veterans in phase 2 on average had 19% more days housed in each 90-day reporting period over the one-year follow-up (p<.002) and 14% fewer days in institutional settings (p=.041). Veterans in phase 2 also had 19% lower Addiction Severity Index (ASI) alcohol use scores (p<.001), 14% lower ASI drug use scores (p=.003), and 8% lower ASI psychiatric problem scores (p=.001).
A sustained training program can be used to implement CTI in systems that have little past experience with this approach and can yield improved housing and mental health outcomes.
本研究评估了针对即将离开退伍军人事务部(VA)住院治疗的患有精神疾病的无家可归退伍军人的关键时间干预(CTI)社区病例管理模式的一种改良方案。CTI提供限时强化病例管理,旨在协调从机构环境到社区生活的过渡。
通过一个主要基于电话会议进行病例审查的培训项目,在八个VA医疗中心实施CTI。在CTI实施前招募了278名参与者作为比较队列(第1阶段),实施后招募了206名参与者作为治疗队列(第2阶段)并为其提供CTI。使用混合回归模型比较第1阶段和第2阶段的结果,并控制两个阶段参与者之间的基线差异。
客户服务提供的衡量指标表明,CTI在大多数地点成功实施。第1阶段的退伍军人在基线时比第2阶段的客户有更好的工作经历和更多的药物使用情况。在控制这些差异后,第2阶段的退伍军人在为期一年的随访中,每90天报告期内平均有房居住的天数多19%(p<0.002),在机构环境中的天数少14%(p = 0.041)。第2阶段的退伍军人成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)酒精使用得分也低19%(p<0.001),ASI药物使用得分低14%(p = 0.003),ASI精神问题得分低8%(p = 0.001)。
一个持续的培训项目可用于在过去对此方法经验很少的系统中实施CTI,并可改善住房和心理健康结果。