• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估跨部门合作:服务使用者评估模式。

Evaluating intersectoral collaboration: a model for assessment by service users.

机构信息

Nordic School of Public Health, P.O. Box 12133, SE-402 42 Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e03. doi: 10.5334/ijic.304. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.304
PMID:19340327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2663704/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

DELTA was launched as a project in 1997 to improve intersectoral collaboration in the rehabilitation field. In 2005 DELTA was transformed into a local association for financial co-ordination between the institutions involved. Based on a study of the DELTA service users, the purpose of this article is to develop and to validate a model that can be used to assess the integration of welfare services from the perspective of the service users.

THEORY

The foundation of integration is a well functioning structure of integration. Without such structural conditions, it is difficult to develop a process of integration that combines the resources and competences of the collaborating organisations to create services advantageous for the service users. In this way, both the structure and the process will contribute to the outcome of integration.

METHOD

The study was carried out as a retrospective cross-sectional survey during two weeks, including all the current service users of DELTA. The questionnaire contained 32 questions, which were derived from the theoretical framework and research on service users, capturing perceptions of integration structure, process and outcome. Ordinal scales and open questions where used for the assessment.

RESULTS

The survey had a response rate of 82% and no serious biases of the results were detected. The study shows that the users of the rehabilitation services perceived the services as well integrated, relevant and adapted to their needs. The assessment model was tested for reliability and validity and a few modifications were suggested. Some key measurement themes were derived from the study.

CONCLUSION

The model developed in this study is an important step towards an assessment of service integration from the perspective of the service users. It needs to be further refined, however, before it can be used in other evaluations of collaboration in the provision of integrated welfare services.

摘要

简介

DELTA 项目于 1997 年启动,旨在改善康复领域的部门间协作。2005 年,DELTA 转型为一个地方协会,负责协调相关机构之间的财务。基于对 DELTA 服务使用者的研究,本文旨在开发和验证一个模型,用于从服务使用者的角度评估福利服务的整合。

理论

整合的基础是一个运作良好的整合结构。没有这种结构性条件,就很难发展一种整合过程,将合作组织的资源和能力结合起来,为服务使用者创造有利的服务。这样,结构和过程都将有助于整合的结果。

方法

该研究是在两周内进行的回顾性横断面调查,包括 DELTA 的所有当前服务使用者。问卷包含 32 个问题,这些问题源自理论框架和对服务使用者的研究,捕捉对整合结构、过程和结果的看法。采用了有序量表和开放式问题进行评估。

结果

调查的回复率为 82%,没有发现结果存在严重偏差。研究表明,康复服务的使用者认为这些服务整合良好,相关且适应他们的需求。评估模型经过了可靠性和有效性的测试,并提出了一些修改建议。从研究中得出了一些关键的测量主题。

结论

本研究开发的模型是从服务使用者的角度评估服务整合的重要步骤。然而,在将其用于评估综合福利服务提供方面的合作的其他评估之前,还需要进一步完善。

相似文献

1
Evaluating intersectoral collaboration: a model for assessment by service users.评估跨部门合作:服务使用者评估模式。
Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e03. doi: 10.5334/ijic.304. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
2
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
3
4
Needs-led research: a way of employing user involvement when devising research questions on the trust model in community home-based health care services in Norway.需求导向型研究:在挪威社区居家医疗服务信任模式研究问题设计中运用用户参与的一种方式。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00291-0.
5
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.
6
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对中风护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,支持其在这方面有效性的证据力度如何?
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2008;6(15):583-632. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200806150-00001.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
9
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
[Healthcare for people with rare diseases: recommendations for successful intersectoral collaboration].[罕见病患者的医疗保健:成功开展跨部门合作的建议]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Aug;66(8):940-948. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03719-y. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
2
Values of Integrated Care: A Systematic Review.综合护理的价值:一项系统综述
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Nov 15;18(4):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4172.
3
An Instrument to Measure Maturity of Integrated Care: A First Validation Study.一种衡量综合护理成熟度的工具:首次验证研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3063.
4
Positive experiences of a vocational rehabilitation intervention for individuals on long-term sick leave, the Dirigo project: a qualitative study.针对长期病假人员的职业康复干预的积极体验——迪里戈项目:一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4804-8.
5
Translating the Patient Perception of Integrated Care Survey to Measure Integrated Care in the Netherlands: Combining Equivalence and Contextualization Approaches for Optimal Results.翻译荷兰患者对综合医疗服务调查的认知以衡量综合医疗服务:结合等效性和情境化方法以取得最佳效果。
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 23;16(3):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2022.
6
Parents' experiences of collaboration between welfare professionals regarding children with anxiety or depression - an explorative study.家长对福利专业人员合作治疗焦虑或抑郁儿童的体验——探索性研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Oct 31;13:e045. doi: 10.5334/ijic.986. eCollection 2013.
7
Strategic collaboration councils in the mental health services: what are they working with?精神卫生服务中的战略协作委员会:它们在与什么合作?
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 8;13:e009. doi: 10.5334/ijic.838. Print 2013 Jan-Mar.
8
Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review.问卷测量连续性护理的测量特性:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042256. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
9
Organizational approaches to collaboration in vocational rehabilitation-an international literature review.组织层面促进职业康复协作的方法——国际文献综述
Int J Integr Care. 2011 Oct;11:e137. doi: 10.5334/ijic.670. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
10
Integrated care in Norway: the state of affairs years after regulation by law.挪威的整合照护:法律规范多年后的现况。
Int J Integr Care. 2011 Jan;11:e001. doi: 10.5334/ijic.530. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Interprofessional collaboration: issues for practice and research.跨专业协作:实践与研究中的问题
Occup Ther Health Care. 2002;15(3-4):1-12. doi: 10.1080/J003v15n03_01.
2
Conceptualization and measurement of integrated human service networks for evaluation.评估用综合人类服务网络的概念化和测量。
Int J Integr Care. 2007 Dec 20;7:e51. doi: 10.5334/ijic.214.
3
Validation of an instrument to measure inter-organisational linkages in general practice.验证一种用于测量一般实践中组织间联系的工具。
Int J Integr Care. 2007 Dec 3;7:e46. doi: 10.5334/ijic.216.
4
Integration and the performance of healthcare networks: do integration strategies enhance efficiency, profitability, and image?医疗保健网络的整合与绩效:整合策略能否提高效率、盈利能力和形象?
Int J Integr Care. 2001;1:e39. doi: 10.5334/ijic.31.
5
Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services.综合医疗:世界卫生组织欧洲综合医疗服务办公室立场文件
Int J Integr Care. 2001;1:e21.
6
Evaluating integrated health care: a model for measurement.评估综合医疗保健:一种测量模型。
Int J Integr Care. 2005;5:e01; discussion e03, e09. doi: 10.5334/ijic.134. Epub 2005 Aug 31.
7
Monitoring the degree of implementation of an integrated delivery system.监测综合医疗服务体系的实施程度。
Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:e05. doi: 10.5334/ijic.106. Epub 2004 Sep 20.
8
Conceptualizing and validating the human services integration measure.构思并验证人类服务整合度量标准。
Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:e03. doi: 10.5334/ijic.98. Epub 2004 May 19.
9
Integration and collaboration in public health--a conceptual framework.公共卫生中的整合与协作——一个概念框架
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2006 Jan-Mar;21(1):75-88. doi: 10.1002/hpm.826.
10
The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks.跨专业协作的概念基础:核心概念与理论框架
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:116-31. doi: 10.1080/13561820500082529.