Suppr超能文献

在蛋白质组学分析之前去除一种、六种、十二种或二十种主要血液蛋白质:越多越好?

Depletion of one, six, twelve or twenty major blood proteins before proteomic analysis: the more the better?

作者信息

Roche Stéphane, Tiers Laurent, Provansal Monique, Seveno Martial, Piva Marie-Thérèse, Jouin Patrick, Lehmann Sylvain

机构信息

CHU Montpellier, Biochimie Saint Eloi, Plateforme de Protéomique Clinique 80 av A. Fliche, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

J Proteomics. 2009 Aug 20;72(6):945-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

Abstract

Depletion of major blood proteins is one of the most promising approaches to access low abundant biomarkers using proteomics. Immunocapture columns often used for this purpose exist in different formats depending on the number of major proteins removed. In this article, we compared the relative interest of depleting either one (albumin), six (albumin, IgG, IgA, transferrin, alpha1-antitrypsin, and haptoglobin), twelve (the previous six and apo A-I and -II, orosomucoid, alpha2-macroglobulin, fibrinogen, IgM) or twenty blood proteins (the previous twelve and IgD, ceruloplasmin, apo B, complement C1q, C3, C4, plasminogen, and prealbumin). Such study raises interesting issues related to the reproducibility, practicability, specificity of the immunocapture, and to the impact of removing not only the selected molecules, but also associated peptides and proteins. Depleted sera were here analysed using different proteomic approaches, including two dimensional electrophoresis and SELDI-TOF. Altogether, our results clearly confirmed the interest of depleting major blood proteins for the proteomic detection of low abundant components. However, we observed that increasing the number of depleted proteins from twelve to twenty had a limited beneficial impact and might increase drawbacks in removing associated peptides and proteins. This conclusion is however related to the technologies that we have used, and we believe that it is necessary to adapt the immunocapture to the analytical method employed, and to the ratio between wanted and unwanted proteins removed.

摘要

消耗主要血液蛋白是利用蛋白质组学获取低丰度生物标志物最有前景的方法之一。用于此目的的免疫捕获柱根据去除的主要蛋白数量不同而有不同形式。在本文中,我们比较了消耗一种(白蛋白)、六种(白蛋白、IgG、IgA、转铁蛋白、α1-抗胰蛋白酶和触珠蛋白)、十二种(前六种加上载脂蛋白A-I和-II、血清类黏蛋白、α2-巨球蛋白、纤维蛋白原、IgM)或二十种血液蛋白(前十二种加上IgD、铜蓝蛋白、载脂蛋白B、补体C1q、C3、C4、纤溶酶原和前白蛋白)的相对优势。此类研究引发了一些有趣的问题,这些问题与免疫捕获的可重复性、实用性、特异性以及不仅去除所选分子,还去除相关肽和蛋白的影响有关。在这里,我们使用不同的蛋白质组学方法分析了耗尽血清,包括二维电泳和表面增强激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(SELDI-TOF)。总之,我们的结果清楚地证实了消耗主要血液蛋白对于蛋白质组学检测低丰度成分的优势。然而,我们观察到将耗尽蛋白的数量从十二种增加到二十种产生的有益影响有限,并且可能会增加去除相关肽和蛋白时的缺点。然而,这一结论与我们所使用的技术有关,并且我们认为有必要使免疫捕获适应所采用的分析方法以及去除的目标蛋白与非目标蛋白的比例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验