Jeffree R L, Gordon D H, Sivasubramaniam R, Chapman A
Department of Neurosurgery, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Jul;16(7):882-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.10.004. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
We present a retrospective, case-controlled study of the degree of over-warfarinisation and the frequency of International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring in patients with spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) compared with a control group without ICH. A higher proportion of patients with ICH were taking warfarin than patients in the control group (33/221 [15%] versus 16/201 [8%], p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the ICH group and the controls in the mean INR of warfarinised patients on presentation, the mean INR when last measured prior to presentation, or in the number of days since the INR was last tested. There was no correlation between the time since the INR was last measured and the INR on presentation. Only 2 (6%) of patients were excessively anticoagulated at the time of ICH. Thus, in this study, warfarin use was associated with an increased risk of ICH despite appropriate community INR monitoring and therapeutic anticoagulation.
我们开展了一项回顾性病例对照研究,比较了自发性颅内出血(ICH)患者与无ICH的对照组患者华法林过量使用的程度以及国际标准化比值(INR)监测的频率。与对照组患者相比,ICH患者服用华法林的比例更高(33/221 [15%] 对16/201 [8%],p<0.05)。ICH组与对照组在就诊时服用华法林患者的平均INR、就诊前最后一次测量时的平均INR或自上次检测INR以来的天数方面均无显著差异。自上次测量INR的时间与就诊时的INR之间无相关性。仅2例(6%)患者在发生ICH时抗凝过度。因此,在本研究中,尽管社区进行了适当的INR监测和治疗性抗凝,但使用华法林仍与ICH风险增加相关。