Hebbar Mohamed, Ychou Marc, Ducreux Michel
Unité d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, 1 rue Michel Polonovski, Lille 59037, France.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun;135(6):749-52. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0580-x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
Irinotecan has an important place in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. It was initially administered as monotherapy, but is now generally used in combination with 5-fluorouracil or targeted therapies (cetuximab or bevacizumab), with various doses.
We here review the main studies assessing irinotecan doses escalation, and discuss the potent advantages of this escalation.
Several studies have demonstrated a dose-intensity relationship for irinotecan, and high doses (up to 600 mg/m2 as monotherapy, 260 mg/m2 in combination therapy) have been used with satisfactory safety and higher objective response rates. It is possible that, in practice, some patients receive insufficient doses of irinotecan. Dose escalation could be considered in carefully selected patients: young patients with a good performance status and normal liver function. This approach could be useful in patients with liver metastases, which may become resectable in the case of a major tumour response. It is wise to perform UGT1A1 genotyping prior to dose escalation to detect patients at high risk of toxicity (genotype 7/7). The role of another laboratory parameter, which needs to be evaluated is the KRAS status of the tumour. A KRAS mutation confers resistance to cetuximab, which reduces treatment options, especially in first-line. However, in the CRYSTAL trial comparing FOLFIRI to FOLFIRI-cetuximab as first-line therapy, the presence of a KRAS mutation did not appear to influence the efficacy of FOLFIRI. The value of irinotecan dose escalation needs to be determined in this setting.
Irinotecan dose escalation is potentially of interest in highly selected patients, but this concept is only based on phase I or II trials and must be validated by a randomized trial. Its value regarding other regimens such as FOLFIRINOX or combinations with targeted therapies also needs to be determined.
伊立替康在转移性结直肠癌的治疗中占有重要地位。它最初作为单一疗法给药,但现在通常与5-氟尿嘧啶或靶向疗法(西妥昔单抗或贝伐单抗)联合使用,使用的剂量各不相同。
我们在此回顾评估伊立替康剂量递增的主要研究,并讨论这种递增的显著优势。
多项研究已证明伊立替康存在剂量强度关系,高剂量(单一疗法可达600mg/m²,联合疗法为260mg/m²)使用时安全性良好且客观缓解率更高。在实际应用中,可能有些患者接受的伊立替康剂量不足。对于精心挑选的患者,如身体状况良好且肝功能正常的年轻患者,可考虑剂量递增。这种方法对有肝转移的患者可能有用,在肿瘤出现显著反应的情况下,肝转移灶可能会变为可切除。在剂量递增前进行UGT1A1基因分型以检测毒性高危患者(基因型7/7)是明智的。另一个需要评估的实验室参数是肿瘤的KRAS状态。KRAS突变会导致对西妥昔单抗耐药,这会减少治疗选择,尤其是在一线治疗中。然而,在比较FOLFIRI与FOLFIRI-西妥昔单抗作为一线治疗的CRYSTAL试验中,KRAS突变的存在似乎并未影响FOLFIRI的疗效。在此背景下,伊立替康剂量递增的价值需要确定。
伊立替康剂量递增对经过高度挑选的患者可能有意义,但这一概念仅基于I期或II期试验,必须通过随机试验进行验证。其在其他方案(如FOLFIRINOX)或与靶向疗法联合使用方面的价值也需要确定。