• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹猪生物瓣膜。标准型与瓣环上型瓣膜7年比较。

Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.

作者信息

Jamieson W R, Tyers G F, Miyagishima R T, Germann E, Janusz M T, Ling H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Canada.

出版信息

Circulation. 1991 Nov;84(5 Suppl):III145-52.

PMID:1934404
Abstract

The performance of the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular (CE-SAV) porcine bioprosthesis is compared with the Carpentier-Edwards standard (CE-S) porcine bioprosthesis at 7 years. The standard prosthesis was implanted in 1,195 patients between 1975 and 1987, while the supra-annular prosthesis was implanted in 1,956 patients between 1982 and 1989. The total follow-up for the standard prosthesis was 8,850 patient-years with a mean follow-up of 7.4 years, while for the supra-annular prosthesis it was 7,317 years with a mean of 3.7 years. The follow-up for the standard prosthesis was 96.7% and for the supra-annular prosthesis was 97.6%. The freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) for aortic replacements is 96.1 +/- 0.9% for CE-S and 97.6 +/- 1.4% for CE-SAV at 7 years (p = NS). The freedom for mitral replacements from SVD is 89.1 +/- 1.7% and 88.6 +/- 2.8%, respectively, for CE-S and CE-SAV (p = NS). The freedom for multiple replacements at 7 years was 80.0 +/- 4.5% for CE-S and 97.8 +/- 1.5% for CE-SAV (p less than or equal to 0.05). The freedom from SVD for the age group equal to or less than 35 years is 79.0 +/- 4.7% for CE-S and 85.0 +/- 9.4% for CE-SAV (p = NS). The freedom for the age group 36-50 years is 85.2 +/- 2.8% and 90.4 +/- 4.5%, respectively, at seven years for the CE-S and CE-SAV prostheses (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对Carpentier-Edwards超环周(CE-SAV)猪生物瓣膜与Carpentier-Edwards标准(CE-S)猪生物瓣膜在7年时的性能进行了比较。1975年至1987年间,1195例患者植入了标准瓣膜,而1982年至1989年间,1956例患者植入了超环周瓣膜。标准瓣膜的总随访时间为8850患者年,平均随访7.4年,而超环周瓣膜为7317患者年,平均3.7年。标准瓣膜的随访率为96.7%,超环周瓣膜为97.6%。7年时,CE-S主动脉置换的无结构性瓣膜退变(SVD)率为96.1±0.9%,CE-SAV为97.6±1.4%(p=无显著性差异)。CE-S和CE-SAV二尖瓣置换的无SVD率分别为89.1±1.7%和88.6±2.8%(p=无显著性差异)。7年时,CE-S多次置换的无SVD率为80.0±4.5%,CE-SAV为97.8±1.5%(p≤0.05)。年龄小于或等于35岁组的CE-S无SVD率为79.0±4.7%,CE-SAV为85.0±9.4%(p=无显著性差异)。CE-S和CE-SAV瓣膜在7年时,36 - 50岁组的无SVD率分别为85.2±2.8%和90.4±4.5%(p=无显著性差异)。(摘要截选至250词)

相似文献

1
Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹猪生物瓣膜。标准型与瓣环上型瓣膜7年比较。
Circulation. 1991 Nov;84(5 Suppl):III145-52.
2
Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹标准型和超环型猪生物瓣膜:瓣膜结构退变的10年比较
J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 Jan;3(1):59-65.
3
Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.Carpentier-Edwards SAV和Hancock-II猪生物瓣膜在主动脉瓣置换术中的性能。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 May;11(3):424-30.
4
Structural valve deterioration in elderly patient populations with the Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: a comparative study.采用Carpentier-Edwards标准和瓣上猪生物瓣膜的老年患者群体中的结构性瓣膜退变:一项对比研究。
J Heart Valve Dis. 1992 Sep;1(1):87-91.
5
Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?二尖瓣疾病:如果二尖瓣无法修复/修复失败,生物假体适合用于置换吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.08.021. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
6
Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.二尖瓣置换手术中的人工瓣膜结构退化:Carpentier-Edwards 超环猪心包生物瓣与 Perimount 心包生物瓣的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Aug;118(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70220-5.
7
Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: assessment of clinical performance.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹猪生物瓣膜:临床性能评估
Can J Cardiol. 1988 Sep;4(6):314-21.
8
Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.猪心包生物瓣膜与心包生物瓣膜:一项前瞻性随机试验的11年随访
J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 May;9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8.
9
Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Has altered design affected performance?主动脉位置的Carpentier-Edwards超环瓣生物假体。设计改变是否影响了性能?
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Jan;5(1):40-4.
10
Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹超环周型主动脉猪生物瓣膜:20年临床性能表现
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;130(4):994-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.040.