• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹标准型和超环型猪生物瓣膜:瓣膜结构退变的10年比较

Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.

作者信息

Jamieson W R, Burr L H, Tyers G F, Munro A I

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 Jan;3(1):59-65.

PMID:8162218
Abstract

From 1975 to 1986 the Carpentier-Edwards standard (CE-S) and supra-annular (CE-SAV) porcine bioprostheses were implanted in 1213 and 1000 patients, respectively. The mean age of the standard group was 57.6 years (range 8 to 85 years) while in the supra-annular group it was 60.7 years (range 13 to 85 years). The freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 10 years for the entire patient population was 79.4% +/- 3.1% with CE-SAV and 76.1% +/- 1.6% with CE-S (p < 0.05). The overall freedom from SVD for those patients undergoing mitral valve replacement (MVR) was 74.5% +/- 4.6% for CE-SAV and 68.7% +/- 2.8% for CE-S (p = NS), while for those undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) it was 86.5% +/- 4.3% for CE-SAV and 84.1% +/- 2.0% for CE-S (p = NS). In those patients under 35 years of age undergoing MVR, the freedom from SVD for CE-SAV and CE-S was 94.4% +/- 5.4% and 62.9% +/- 8.6%, respectively (p < 0.05 at 8 years); for those aged 36-50 years, it was 75.6% +/- 7.4% and 61.7% +/- 6.0%; for those aged 51-65 years, it was 76.2% +/- 7.4% and 69.6% +/- 4.2%; for those over 65 years, it was 74.1% +/- 7.1% and 82.2% +/- 5.2%; for those aged 65-69 years, it was 70.2% +/- 8.7% and 63.7% +/- 8.1%; and for those over 70 years of age, it was 79.2% +/- 8.7% and 95.3% +/- 3.2%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

1975年至1986年期间,分别有1213例和1000例患者植入了卡彭蒂埃 - 爱德华兹标准型(CE-S)和环上型(CE-SAV)猪生物瓣膜。标准型组患者的平均年龄为57.6岁(范围8至85岁),而环上型组为60.7岁(范围13至85岁)。整个患者群体在10年时无结构性瓣膜退变(SVD)的比例,CE-SAV为79.4%±3.1%,CE-S为76.1%±1.6%(p<0.05)。接受二尖瓣置换术(MVR)的患者中,CE-SAV无SVD的总体比例为74.5%±4.6%,CE-S为68.7%±2.8%(p=无显著差异);接受主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的患者中,CE-SAV为86.5%±4.3%,CE-S为84.1%±2.0%(p=无显著差异)。在年龄小于35岁接受MVR的患者中,CE-SAV和CE-S无SVD的比例分别为94.4%±5.4%和62.9%±8.6%(8年时p<0.05);36至50岁的患者中,分别为75.6%±7.4%和61.7%±6.0%;51至65岁的患者中,分别为76.2%±7.4%和69.6%±4.2%;65岁以上的患者中,分别为74.1%±7.1%和82.2%±5.2%;65至69岁的患者中,分别为70.2%±8.7%和63.7%±8.1%;70岁以上的患者中,分别为79.2%±8.7%和95.3%±3.2%。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹标准型和超环型猪生物瓣膜:瓣膜结构退变的10年比较
J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 Jan;3(1):59-65.
2
Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹猪生物瓣膜。标准型与瓣环上型瓣膜7年比较。
Circulation. 1991 Nov;84(5 Suppl):III145-52.
3
Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.Carpentier-Edwards SAV和Hancock-II猪生物瓣膜在主动脉瓣置换术中的性能。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 May;11(3):424-30.
4
Structural valve deterioration in elderly patient populations with the Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: a comparative study.采用Carpentier-Edwards标准和瓣上猪生物瓣膜的老年患者群体中的结构性瓣膜退变:一项对比研究。
J Heart Valve Dis. 1992 Sep;1(1):87-91.
5
Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?二尖瓣疾病:如果二尖瓣无法修复/修复失败,生物假体适合用于置换吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.08.021. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
6
Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.二尖瓣置换手术中的人工瓣膜结构退化:Carpentier-Edwards 超环猪心包生物瓣与 Perimount 心包生物瓣的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Aug;118(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70220-5.
7
Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.猪心包生物瓣膜与心包生物瓣膜:一项前瞻性随机试验的11年随访
J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 May;9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8.
8
Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: comparison of technology.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹标准型和超环型猪生物瓣膜:技术比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jan;67(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01056-x.
9
Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.猪生物瓣膜的二十年临床经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00629-7.
10
Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.采用卡彭蒂埃-爱德华兹心包生物瓣膜进行主动脉瓣和二尖瓣置换术:10年随访结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Jan;5(1):45-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.使用微观模拟比较机械瓣膜或生物瓣膜置换主动脉瓣后的结局。
Heart. 2004 Oct;90(10):1172-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.013102.