Wheaton Lewis, Fridman Esteban, Bohlhalter Stephan, Vorbach Sherry, Hallett Mark
Human Motor Control Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 May;120(5):980-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.161. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
We sought to investigate the activity of bilateral parietal and premotor areas during a Go/No Go paradigm involving praxis movements of the dominant hand.
A sentence was presented which instructed subjects on what movement to make (S1; for example, "Show me how to use a hammer."). After an 8-s delay, "Go" or "No Go" (S2) was presented. If Go, they were instructed to make the movement described in the S1 instruction sentence as quickly as possible, and continuously until the "Rest" cue was presented 3 s later. If No Go, subjects were to simply relax until the next instruction sentence. Event-related potentials (ERP) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the beta band (18-22 Hz) were evaluated for three time bins: after S1, after S2, and from -2.5 to -1.5 s before the S2 period.
Bilateral premotor ERP was greater than bilateral parietal ERP after the S2 Go compared with the No Go. Additionally, left premotor ERP was greater than that from the right premotor area. There was predominant left parietal ERD immediately after S1 for both Go and No Go, which was sustained for the duration of the interval between S1 and S2. For both S2 stimuli, predominant left parietal ERD was again seen when compared to that from the left premotor or right parietal area. However, the left parietal ERD was greater for Go than No Go.
The results suggest a dominant role in the left parietal cortex for planning, executing, and suppressing praxis movements. The ERP and ERD show different patterns of activation and may reflect distinct neural movement-related activities.
The data can guide further studies to determine the neurophysiological changes occurring in apraxia patients and help explain the unique error profiles seen in patients with left parietal damage.
我们试图研究在涉及优势手运用动作的“执行/不执行”范式中双侧顶叶和运动前区的活动。
呈现一个句子,指示受试者做出何种动作(S1;例如,“给我演示如何使用锤子”)。延迟8秒后,呈现“执行”或“不执行”(S2)。如果是“执行”,则指示他们尽快做出S1指令句子中描述的动作,并持续进行,直到3秒后出现“休息”提示。如果是“不执行”,受试者只需放松,直到下一个指令句子出现。对三个时间段的事件相关电位(ERP)和β频段(18 - 22赫兹)的事件相关去同步化(ERD)进行评估:S1之后、S2之后以及S2时间段前 -2.5至 -1.5秒。
与“不执行”相比,“执行”的S2之后双侧运动前区ERP大于双侧顶叶ERP。此外,左侧运动前区ERP大于右侧运动前区。对于“执行”和“不执行”,S1之后立即出现以左侧顶叶为主的ERD,并在S1和S2之间的间隔持续存在。对于两种S2刺激,与左侧运动前区或右侧顶叶区域相比,再次观察到以左侧顶叶为主的ERD。然而,“执行”时左侧顶叶ERD大于“不执行”。
结果表明左侧顶叶皮质在规划、执行和抑制运用动作方面起主导作用。ERP和ERD显示出不同的激活模式,可能反映了与运动相关的不同神经活动。
这些数据可指导进一步研究,以确定失用症患者发生的神经生理变化,并有助于解释左侧顶叶损伤患者中出现的独特错误模式。