Suppr超能文献

急诊科留观患者转至住院病房走廊与死亡率之间的关联:一项为期4年的经验研究。

The association between transfer of emergency department boarders to inpatient hallways and mortality: a 4-year experience.

作者信息

Viccellio Asa, Santora Carolyn, Singer Adam J, Thode Henry C, Henry Mark C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8350, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;54(4):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 3.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We developed and implemented an institutional protocol aimed at reducing crowding by admitting boarded patients to hospital inpatient hallways. We hypothesized that transfer of admitted patients from the emergency department (ED) to inpatient hallways would be feasible and not create patient harm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study in a suburban, academic ED with an annual census of 70,000. We studied consecutive patients admitted from our ED between January 2004 and January 2008. In 2001, a multidisciplinary team developed and implemented an institutional protocol in which admitted adult patients boarded in the ED were transferred to hospital inpatient hallways under select conditions. We extracted data from the electronic medical record system, measuring patient demographics, ED disposition (discharge, admit to floor, admit to hallway), ED length of stay, and inhospital mortality. We report ED length of stay, subsequent transfer to an ICU, and hospital mortality of patients admitted to standard and hallway inpatient beds.

RESULTS

Of 55,062 ED patients admitted, there were 1,798 deaths. Of all admissions, 2,042 (4%) went to a hallway; 53,020 went to a standard bed. Patients admitted to standard and hallway beds were similar in age (median [interquartile range] 55 years [37 to 72 years] and 54 years [41 to 70 years], respectively) and sex (48.2% and 50% female patients, respectively). The median (interquartile range) times from ED triage to actual admission in patients admitted to standard and hallway beds were 426 minutes (306 to 600 minutes) and 624 (439 to 895 minutes) minutes, respectively (P<.001). Median ED census at triage was lower for standard bed admissions than for hallway patients (44 [33 to 53] versus 50 [38 to 61], respectively, P<.001). Inhospital mortality rates were higher among patients admitted to standard beds (2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5% to 2.7%) than among patients admitted to hallway beds (1.1%; 95% CI 0.7% to 1.7%). ICU transfers were also higher in the standard bed admissions (6.7% [95% CI 6.5% to 6.9%] versus 2.5% [95% CI 1.9% to 3.3%]).

CONCLUSION

Transfer of ED-boarded admitted patients to an inpatient hallway occurs during high ED census and waiting times for admission but does not appears to result in patient harm.

摘要

研究目的

我们制定并实施了一项机构方案,旨在通过将滞留患者收治到医院住院部走廊来缓解拥挤状况。我们假设将急诊部(ED)收治的患者转至住院部走廊是可行的,且不会对患者造成伤害。

方法

这是一项在郊区学术性急诊部进行的回顾性队列研究,年接诊量为70,000人次。我们研究了2004年1月至2008年1月期间从该急诊部连续收治的患者。2001年,一个多学科团队制定并实施了一项机构方案,即在特定条件下,将急诊部滞留的成年收治患者转至医院住院部走廊。我们从电子病历系统中提取数据,测量患者人口统计学特征、急诊处置情况(出院、收住病房、收住走廊)、急诊留观时间和住院死亡率。我们报告收住标准病房和走廊病房患者的急诊留观时间、随后转入重症监护病房(ICU)的情况以及住院死亡率。

结果

在55,062例急诊部收治患者中,有1,798例死亡。在所有收治患者中,2,042例(4%)被收住走廊;53,020例被收住标准病房。收住标准病房和走廊病房的患者在年龄(中位数[四分位间距]分别为55岁[37至72岁]和54岁[41至70岁])和性别(女性患者分别占48.2%和50%)方面相似。收住标准病房和走廊病房的患者从急诊分诊到实际收治的中位(四分位间距)时间分别为426分钟(306至600分钟)和624分钟(439至895分钟)(P<0.001)。分诊时急诊部普查的中位人数,标准病房收治患者低于走廊病房患者(分别为44[33至53]和50[38至61],P<0.001)。收住标准病房患者的住院死亡率高于收住走廊病房患者(2.6%;95%置信区间[CI]2.5%至2.7%)(1.1%;95%CI0.7%至1.7%)。标准病房收治患者转入ICU的比例也更高(6.7%[95%CI6.5%至6.9%]对2.5%[95%CI1.9%至3.3%])。

结论

在急诊部普查人数多且等待收治时间长的情况下,将急诊部滞留的收治患者转至住院部走廊是可行的,且似乎不会对患者造成伤害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验