Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Jan 27;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00443-3.
Emergency department overcrowding is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and poor patients and staff experience. Full capacity protocols enabling hallway boarding in internal wards are instituted to relieve emergency room overcrowding. The effect of hallway boarding on the clinical outcomes of all inpatients in the internal wards has not been studied. Early in 2016, a decision to enable hallway boarding in the internal wing in our medical center came into effect, comprising an abrupt change to the medical center's policy. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of hallway boarding on patients who were hospitalized in the internal wards.
General linear regression analysis, based on administrative data about admissions of patients, from January 2013 through September 2019, is used to compare in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission and 30-day mortality rates, of inpatients hospitalized in two internal departments in our medical center, before and after the policy change.
Eight thousand five hundred eighty-three patients and 11,962 patients were admitted to internal departments A and B, before and after the policy change, respectively. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was lower after the policy change (OR 0.76, [CI, 0.65 to 0.90]), 30-day readmission was mildly higher (OR, 1.18 [CI, 1.00 to 1.40]) and no change in 30-day mortality was observed (OR 1.16 [CI, 0.88 to 1.53]). The results emanate from corresponding changes in department A. No apparent change was observed in the length of hospital stay in department A, while a shorter length of stay was observed in department B.
Enabling inpatient boarding in our medical center, effectively, had increased bed capacity and generated an increase in the volume of patients. It was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and an increased 30-day readmission, without increasing 30-day mortality. Since this is an observational study, conducted in a single center, further research is necessary to confirm and qualify these observations.
急诊室过度拥挤与不良的临床结果以及患者和医护人员体验不佳有关。实施使内科病房走廊容纳更多患者的满负荷协议,以缓解急诊室过度拥挤。走廊容纳尚未研究对内科病房所有住院患者的临床结果的影响。2016 年初,我们医疗中心内部病房走廊容纳的决策生效,这是对医疗中心政策的突然改变。本研究的目的是研究走廊容纳对住院于内科病房的患者的影响。
使用基于 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月的患者入院行政数据的广义线性回归分析,比较我们医疗中心两个内科部门的住院患者在政策变化前后的住院死亡率、30 天再入院率和 30 天死亡率。
在政策变化前后,分别有 8583 名和 11962 名患者入住内科 A 病房和 B 病房。政策变更后住院死亡率降低(调整后比值比 0.76,[置信区间,0.65 至 0.90]),30 天再入院率略有升高(调整后比值比 1.18 [CI,1.00 至 1.40]),30 天死亡率没有变化(调整后比值比 1.16 [CI,0.88 至 1.53])。结果源于部门 A 的相应变化。部门 A 的住院时间没有明显变化,而部门 B 的住院时间缩短。
在我们的医疗中心实施住院患者走廊容纳,有效地增加了床位容量并增加了患者数量。它与较低的住院死亡率和较高的 30 天再入院率相关,而不会增加 30 天死亡率。由于这是一项在单一中心进行的观察性研究,因此需要进一步研究来证实和限定这些观察结果。