• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Floral convergence in Oncidiinae (Cymbidieae; Orchidaceae): an expanded concept of Gomesa and a new genus Nohawilliamsia.文心兰亚族(兰科,蕙兰属)中的花部趋同现象:戈梅萨属概念的扩展及新属诺哈威廉姆斯兰属
Ann Bot. 2009 Aug;104(3):387-402. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp067. Epub 2009 Apr 4.
2
Comparative anatomy of floral elaiophores in Vitekorchis Romowicz & Szlach., Cyrtochilum Kunth and a florally dimorphic species of Oncidium Sw. (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae).维特科兰属(Vitekorchis Romowicz & Szlach.)、筒距兰属(Cyrtochilum Kunth)及一种具花二型性的文心兰属(Oncidium Sw.)植物(兰科:文心兰亚族)花油体的比较解剖学
Ann Bot. 2014 Jun;113(7):1155-73. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu045. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
3
Comparative anatomy of the floral elaiophore in representatives of the newly re-circumscribed Gomesa and Oncidium clades (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae).新界定的戈麦斯兰属和文心兰属代表植物花蜜腺的比较解剖学(兰科:文心兰族)。
Ann Bot. 2013 Sep;112(5):839-54. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct149. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
4
Floral elaiophore structure in four representatives of the Ornithocephalus clade (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae).四个 Ornithocephalus 分支(兰科:Oncidiinae)代表植物的花距结构。
Ann Bot. 2012 Sep;110(4):809-20. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs158. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
5
Comparative histology of floral elaiophores in the orchids Rudolfiella picta (Schltr.) Hoehne (Maxillariinae sensu lato) and Oncidium ornithorhynchum H.B.K. (Oncidiinae sensu lato).兰花Rudolfiella picta (Schltr.) Hoehne(广义上的颚唇兰亚族)和Oncidium ornithorhynchum H.B.K.(广义上的文心兰亚族)中花油体的比较组织学
Ann Bot. 2009 Aug;104(2):221-34. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp119. Epub 2009 May 15.
6
A molecular phylogeny for the large African orchid genus Disa.大型非洲兰花属兜兰属的分子系统发育研究。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Apr;43(1):75-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.014. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
7
Comparative reproductive biology and pollinator specificity among sympatric Gomesa (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae).同域分布的戈梅萨兰属(兰科:文心兰亚族)植物的比较繁殖生物学与传粉者特异性
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2017 Mar;19(2):147-155. doi: 10.1111/plb.12525. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
8
Molecular phylogenetics of the species-rich genus Habenaria (Orchidaceae) in the New World based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences.基于核和质体 DNA 序列的新大陆物种丰富的兰属(Orchidaceae)的分子系统发育。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Apr;67(1):95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
9
Floral and vegetative morphometrics of five Pleurothallis (Orchidaceae) species: correlation with taxonomy, phylogeny, genetic variability and pollination systems.五种肋柱兰属(兰科)植物的花部和营养形态测量:与分类学、系统发育、遗传变异性及授粉系统的相关性
Ann Bot. 2002 Aug;90(2):219-30. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf168.
10
Molecular phylogenetics and floral evolution of the Cirrhopetalum alliance (Bulbophyllum, Orchidaceae): Evolutionary transitions and phylogenetic signal variation.分子系统发育和兜兰亚族(石豆兰属,兰科)的花进化:进化转变和系统发育信号变异。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020 Feb;143:106689. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106689. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
New plastome structural rearrangements discovered in core Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae) support recently adopted taxonomy.在铁兰亚科核心类群(凤梨科)中发现的新质体基因组结构重排支持了最近采用的分类法。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 1;13:924922. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.924922. eCollection 2022.
2
The complete chloroplast genome sequence of .……的完整叶绿体基因组序列
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2022 Jul 7;7(7):1237-1239. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2093670. eCollection 2022.
3
Interaction between and : Incidence of an outlier in modular pollination network of oil flowers.与 之间的相互作用:油花模块化传粉网络中异常值的发生率。 需注意,原文中“Interaction between and :”这里两个“and”之间缺少具体内容,翻译只能按现有内容尽量准确呈现。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 14;12(3):e8697. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8697. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Müllerian mimicry between oil-producing orchids and Malpighiaceae? An old hypothesis finally tested.产油兰科和大戟科之间存在穆勒拟态关系?这一古老假说终于得到了验证。
Naturwissenschaften. 2021 Dec 7;109(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00114-021-01771-9.
5
Target Nuclear and Off-Target Plastid Hybrid Enrichment Data Inform a Range of Evolutionary Depths in the Orchid Genus .靶向核与非靶向质体杂交富集数据揭示了兰花属植物一系列的进化深度。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 29;10:1761. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01761. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparative survey of secretory structures and floral anatomy of Cohniella cepula and Cohniella jonesiana (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae). New evidences of nectaries and osmophores in the genus.对 Cepula 和 Jonesiana 属(兰科:Oncidiinae)的分泌结构和花部解剖的比较研究。属中新的蜜腺和渗透器官的证据。
Protoplasma. 2019 May;256(3):703-720. doi: 10.1007/s00709-018-1330-1. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Orchid phylogenomics and multiple drivers of their extraordinary diversification.兰花系统发育基因组学及其非凡多样化的多种驱动因素。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 7;282(1814). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1553.
8
Specklinia dunstervillei, a New Species Long Confused with Specklinia endotrachys (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae).邓氏堇兰,一种长期以来与内鞘堇兰混淆的新物种(兰科:腋唇兰亚族)。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0131971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131971. eCollection 2015.
9
Pollination of Specklinia by nectar-feeding Drosophila: the first reported case of a deceptive syndrome employing aggregation pheromones in Orchidaceae.食蜜果蝇对斯佩克林兰属植物的授粉:兰科中首例利用聚集信息素的欺骗性综合症的报道案例。
Ann Bot. 2015 Sep;116(3):437-55. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv086. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
10
Comparative anatomy of floral elaiophores in Vitekorchis Romowicz & Szlach., Cyrtochilum Kunth and a florally dimorphic species of Oncidium Sw. (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae).维特科兰属(Vitekorchis Romowicz & Szlach.)、筒距兰属(Cyrtochilum Kunth)及一种具花二型性的文心兰属(Oncidium Sw.)植物(兰科:文心兰亚族)花油体的比较解剖学
Ann Bot. 2014 Jun;113(7):1155-73. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu045. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.系统发育树的置信区间:一种使用自展法的方法。
Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783-791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x.
2
Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence.Maxillarieae(兰科)亚族和属级关系以及Stanhopeinae 的重点:综合分子证据。
Am J Bot. 2000 Dec;87(12):1842-56.
3
Multigene family of ribosomal DNA in Drosophila melanogaster reveals contrasting patterns of homogenization for IGS and ITS spacer regions. A possible mechanism to resolve this paradox.黑腹果蝇核糖体DNA的多基因家族揭示了间隔区(IGS)和内转录间隔区(ITS)的趋同模式形成对比。解决这一矛盾的一种可能机制。
Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):243-56. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.243.

文心兰亚族(兰科,蕙兰属)中的花部趋同现象:戈梅萨属概念的扩展及新属诺哈威廉姆斯兰属

Floral convergence in Oncidiinae (Cymbidieae; Orchidaceae): an expanded concept of Gomesa and a new genus Nohawilliamsia.

作者信息

Chase Mark W, Williams Norris H, de Faria Aparacida Donisete, Neubig Kurt M, Amaral Maria do Carmo E, Whitten W Mark

机构信息

Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK.

出版信息

Ann Bot. 2009 Aug;104(3):387-402. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp067. Epub 2009 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mcp067
PMID:19346522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2720657/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Floral morphology, particularly the angle of lip attachment to the column, has historically been the fundamental character used in establishing generic limits in subtribe Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae), but it has also been long recognized that reliance on this character alone has produced a highly artificial set of genera. In essence, lip/column relationships reflect syndromes associated with pollinator preferences; most genera of Oncidiinae as previously defined have consisted of a single floral type. Here, the degree to which this has influenced generic delimitation in Brazilian members of the largest genus of Oncidiinae, Oncidium, which previous molecular (DNA) studies have demonstrated to be polyphyletic, is evaluated.

METHODS

Phylogenetic analyses of the following multiple DNA regions were used: the plastid psbA-trnH intergenic spacer, matK exon and two regions of ycf1 exon and nuclear ribosomal DNA, comprised of the two internal transcribed spacers, ITS1 and ITS2, and the 5.8S gene. Results from all regions analysed separately indicated highly similar relationships, so a combined matrix was analysed.

KEY RESULTS

Nearly all species groups of Brazilian Oncidium are only distantly related to the type species of the genus, O. altissimum, from the Caribbean. There are two exceptions to this geographical rule: O. baueri is related to the type group and O. orthostates, an isolated species that lacks the defining tabula infrastigmata of Oncidium, is not exclusively related to any previously described genus in the subtribe. Several well-supported subclades can be observed in these results, but they do not correspond well to sections of Oncidium as previously circumscribed or to segregate genera as defined by several recent authors. In spite of their floral differences, these groups of Oncidium, formerly treated as O. sections Barbata, Concoloria pro parte, Crispa, Ranifera, Rhinocerotes, Rostrata (only O. venustum), Synsepala, Verrucituberculata pro parte and Waluewa, form a well-supported clade with Gomesa (including Rodrigueziella and Rodrigueziopsis) embedded in it. Two often recognized segregate genera, Baptistonia and Ornithophora, and the recently described Carriella are also embedded within the Brazilian clade. The level of variation within major subclades of the Gomesa clade is low and similar to that observed within other genera of Oncidiinae.

CONCLUSIONS

Convergence on a stereotypical syndrome of floral traits associated with pollination by oil-collecting bees has resulted in these characters not being reliable for producing monophyletic taxa, and the genus Oncidium, defined by these characters, is grossly polyphyletic. Vegetative and a few floral/inflorescence characters link these taxa with a mainly Brazilian distribution, and they were all transferred to Gomesa on this basis rather than separated from Gomesa based on their floral differences, which we hypothesize to be simple shifts in pollination strategies. Other authors have described a large number of new genera for these former members of Oncidium, but most of these are not supported by the results presented here (i.e. they are not monophyletic). A new genus, Nohawilliamsia, is described for O. orthostates because it does not fit in any currently recognized genus and is only distantly related to any other member of Oncidiinae.

摘要

背景

花的形态,尤其是唇瓣与蕊柱的附着角度,一直是历史上用于界定文心兰亚族(兰科)属级界限的基本特征,但长期以来人们也认识到仅依赖这一特征会产生一套高度人为划分的属。本质上,唇瓣/蕊柱关系反映了与传粉者偏好相关的综合征;如之前所定义,大多数文心兰亚族的属都由单一花型组成。在此,评估这种情况在文心兰亚族最大属——文心兰属的巴西成员中对属级界定的影响程度,之前的分子(DNA)研究已证明该属是多系的。

方法

对以下多个DNA区域进行系统发育分析:质体psbA - trnH基因间隔区、matK外显子以及ycf1外显子的两个区域和核糖体DNA,后者由两个内部转录间隔区ITS1和ITS2以及5.8S基因组成。分别分析所有区域得到的结果显示出高度相似的关系,因此对合并矩阵进行了分析。

关键结果

巴西文心兰的几乎所有物种组与该属的模式种、来自加勒比地区的高文心兰亲缘关系都很疏远。这一地理规律有两个例外:鲍氏文心兰与模式组相关,而直立柱文心兰是一个孤立物种,缺乏文心兰属典型的柱头下板,它并不完全与该亚族中任何先前描述的属相关。在这些结果中可以观察到几个得到有力支持的亚分支,但它们与之前界定的文心兰属的组或几位近期作者定义的分立属并不完全对应。尽管它们的花存在差异,但这些文心兰组,以前被视为文心兰属的髯毛组、部分纯色组、皱边组、瘤瓣组、犀角组、具喙组(仅细纹文心兰)、合萼组、疣瘤组部分以及瓦卢埃瓦组,与嵌入其中的戈梅萨属(包括罗氏兰属和拟罗氏兰属)形成了一个得到有力支持的分支。两个经常被认可的分立属,巴氏兰属和鸟舌兰属,以及最近描述的卡里兰属也嵌入在巴西分支内。戈梅萨分支主要亚分支内的变异水平较低,与在文心兰亚族其他属中观察到的情况相似。

结论

趋同于与采油蜂传粉相关的花部特征的刻板综合征,导致这些特征对于产生单系类群不可靠,并且由这些特征定义的文心兰属是高度多系的。营养体特征以及一些花部/花序特征将这些主要分布在巴西的类群联系起来,基于此它们都被转移到戈梅萨属,而不是基于它们的花部差异与戈梅萨属分开,我们推测这些花部差异只是传粉策略的简单转变。其他作者为这些以前的文心兰属成员描述了大量新属,但这里呈现的结果并不支持其中大多数(即它们不是单系的)。为直立柱文心兰描述了一个新属——诺哈威廉姆斯兰属,因为它不符合任何目前认可的属,并且与文心兰亚族的任何其他成员亲缘关系都很疏远。